• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤后脑血流自动调节与脑血管压力反应性的关系。

The relationship between cerebral blood flow autoregulation and cerebrovascular pressure reactivity after traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2012 Sep;71(3):652-60; discussion 660-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318260feb1.

DOI:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318260feb1
PMID:22653390
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cerebrovascular pressure reactivity is the principal mechanism of cerebral autoregulation. Assessment of cerebral autoregulation can be performed by using the mean flow index (Mx) based on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Cerebrovascular pressure reactivity can be monitored by using the pressure reactivity index (PRx), which is based on intracranial pressure monitoring. From a practical point of view, PRx can be monitored continuously, whereas Mx can only be monitored in short periods when transcranial Doppler probes can be applied.

OBJECTIVE

To assess to what degree impairment in pressure reactivity (PRx) is associated with impairment in cerebral autoregulation (Mx).

METHODS

A database of 345 patients with traumatic brain injury was screened for data availability including simultaneous Mx and PRx monitoring. Absolute differences, temporal changes, and association with outcome of the 2 indices were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 486 recording sessions obtained from 201 patients were available for analysis. Overall a moderate correlation between Mx and PRx was found (r = 0.58; P < .001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve designed to detect the ability of PRx to predict impaired cerebral autoregulation was 0.700 (95% confidence interval: 0.607-0.880). Discrepancies between Mx and PRx were most pronounced at an intracranial pressure of 30 mm Hg and they were significantly larger for patients who died (P = .026). Both Mx and PRx were significantly lower at day 1 postadmission in patients who survived than in those who died (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

There is moderate agreement between Mx and PRx. Discrepancies between Mx and PRx are particularly significant in patients with sustained intracranial hypertension. However, for clinical purposes, there is only limited interchangeability between indices.

摘要

背景

脑血管压力反应性是脑自动调节的主要机制。可通过经颅多普勒超声的平均血流指数 (Mx) 评估脑自动调节。可通过基于颅内压监测的压力反应指数 (PRx) 监测脑血管压力反应性。从实际角度来看,PRx 可以连续监测,而 Mx 只能在可以应用经颅多普勒探头的短时间内监测。

目的

评估压力反应性 (PRx) 的损伤与脑自动调节 (Mx) 的损伤相关的程度。

方法

筛选了 345 例创伤性脑损伤患者的数据库,以获取包括同时监测 Mx 和 PRx 的数据可用性。分析了 2 个指数的绝对差异、时间变化和与结果的相关性。

结果

从 201 例患者中获得了总共 486 次记录,可用于分析。总体而言,Mx 和 PRx 之间存在中度相关性 (r = 0.58;P <.001)。设计用于检测 PRx 预测脑自动调节受损能力的接收者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.700(95%置信区间:0.607-0.880)。在颅内压为 30 mmHg 时,Mx 和 PRx 之间的差异最为明显,在死亡患者中差异显著更大 (P =.026)。与死亡患者相比,存活患者入院后第 1 天的 Mx 和 PRx 均显著降低 (P <.01)。

结论

Mx 和 PRx 之间存在中度一致性。在持续颅内高压的患者中,Mx 和 PRx 之间的差异尤其显著。然而,对于临床目的,指数之间只有有限的可互换性。

相似文献

1
The relationship between cerebral blood flow autoregulation and cerebrovascular pressure reactivity after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后脑血流自动调节与脑血管压力反应性的关系。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Sep;71(3):652-60; discussion 660-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318260feb1.
2
Autoregulation monitoring and outcome prediction in neurocritical care patients: Does one index fit all?神经重症监护患者的自动调节监测与预后预测:一个指标能适用于所有情况吗?
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Jun;30(3):367-75. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9726-3. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
3
Is Impaired Autoregulation Associated with Mortality in Patients with Severe Cerebral Diseases?严重脑部疾病患者的自动调节功能受损与死亡率相关吗?
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2016;122:181-5. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_37.
4
Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in patients with head injury.对颅脑损伤患者脑血管压力反应性的持续监测。
Neurosurg Focus. 2008 Oct;25(4):E2. doi: 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.10.E2.
5
Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.基于逐分钟监测数据的重型颅脑损伤患者压力自动调节监测及脑灌注压目标推荐
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
6
Monitoring cerebral autoregulation after brain injury: multimodal assessment of cerebral slow-wave oscillations using near-infrared spectroscopy.脑损伤后脑自动调节功能的监测:使用近红外光谱对脑慢波振荡进行多模态评估
Anesth Analg. 2015 Jul;121(1):198-205. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000790.
7
ICP Versus Laser Doppler Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices to Assess Brain Autoregulatory Capacity.颅内压与激光多普勒脑血流反应指数评估脑自动调节能力。
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Apr;28(2):194-202. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0472-x.
8
A continuous correlation between intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity reflects cerebral autoregulation impairment during intracranial pressure plateau waves.颅内压与脑血流速度之间的持续相关性反映了颅内压平台波期间的脑自动调节功能受损。
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21(3):514-25. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-9994-7.
9
Continuous assessment of cerebrovascular autoregulation after traumatic brain injury using brain tissue oxygen pressure reactivity.使用脑组织氧分压反应性对创伤性脑损伤后脑血管自动调节进行连续评估。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):1783-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000218413.51546.9E.
10
Cerebral vasomotor reactivity testing in head injury: the link between pressure and flow.头部损伤中的脑血管舒缩反应性测试:压力与血流之间的联系
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;74(8):1053-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.8.1053.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Pressure Reactivity and Cerebral Oximetry Indexes in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Single-Center Pilot Study.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者压力反应性与脑氧饱和度指数的关系:一项单中心初步研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02314-0.
2
Continuous personalized cerebrovascular reactivity-based physiologic metrics in neurocritical care: a narrative review of the current landscape, limitations, and future directions.神经重症监护中基于持续个性化脑血管反应性的生理指标:对当前现状、局限性及未来方向的叙述性综述
Front Physiol. 2025 May 6;16:1582813. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1582813. eCollection 2025.
3
Personalizing the Pressure Reactivity Index for Quantifying Cerebral Autoregulation in Neurocritical Care.
个性化压力反应指数以量化神经重症监护中的脑自动调节功能
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2025 May 15;PP. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2025.3570249.
4
Untangling discrepancies between cerebrovascular autoregulation correlation coefficients: An exploration of filters, coherence and power.梳理脑血管自动调节相关系数之间的差异:对滤波器、相干性和功率的探索。
Physiol Rep. 2025 Apr;13(8):e70332. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70332.
5
An Overview of Adult Acute Traumatic Neurologic Injury for the Anesthesiologist: .麻醉医生视角下的成人急性创伤性神经损伤概述:
Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2025;15. doi: 10.1007/s40140-024-00667-4. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
6
Characterization of RAP Signal Patterns, Temporal Relationships, and Artifact Profiles Derived from Intracranial Pressure Sensors in Acute Traumatic Neural Injury.急性创伤性神经损伤中颅内压传感器的RAP信号模式、时间关系及伪影特征分析
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;25(2):586. doi: 10.3390/s25020586.
7
Traumatic brain injury causes early aggregation of beta-amyloid peptides and NOTCH3 reduction in vascular smooth muscle cells of leptomeningeal arteries.创伤性脑损伤导致β-淀粉样肽早期聚集,并使软脑膜动脉血管平滑肌细胞中的NOTCH3减少。
Acta Neuropathol. 2025 Jan 22;149(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s00401-025-02848-9.
8
Intraspinal Pressure is Not Elevated After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in a Porcine Model Sham-Controlled Trial.猪模型假手术对照试验中创伤性脊髓损伤后脊髓内压力未升高
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Dec 11. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02181-1.
9
Cerebral haemodynamics and intracranial pressure during haemorrhagic shock and resuscitation with total endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in an animal model.动物模型中失血性休克及经主动脉完全血管内球囊阻断复苏过程中的脑血流动力学和颅内压
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Dec;50(6):3069-3082. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02646-0. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
10
The association of acute and chronic phase cerebrovascular reactivity with patient reported quality of life following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.中重度创伤性脑损伤患者报告的生活质量与急慢性期脑血管反应性的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 5;14(1):20737. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71843-z.