Katyayan Manish, Katyayan Preeti, Ravishankar K
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2011 Jun;11(2):89-97. doi: 10.1007/s13191-011-0069-6. Epub 2011 Jun 4.
A growing number of composite materials are being used as an alternative for veneering cast restorations. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of UDMA based composite, restorative composite, and heat cure acrylic when veneered to Ni-Cr alloy and to evaluate the type of bond failure. Three different veneering materials were used: heat cure acrylic, UDMA based composite and a restorative composite. 10 samples were fabricated, each with heat cure acrylic and restorative composite and 20 samples were fabricated with UDMA based composite; thus, the total number of samples amounted to 40. All the samples were subject to shear bond stress fracture tests and observed for the type of bond failure. The greatest mean shear bond strength was recorded in relation to the UDMA based composite material when thermal conducting paste was used during the curing (10.51 MPa). The mean bond strength values of UDMA based composite without thermal conducting paste (8.92 MPa), heat cured acrylic veneering material (4.24 MPa) and restorative composite material (5.03 MPa) were significantly different from each other (p > 0.05). Samples veneered with heat cure acrylic veneering material and restorative composite material showed adhesive failure. Samples prepared with UDMA based composite veneering composite showed cohesive or predominantly cohesive failure. UDMA based composite veneering material when used with heat protection paste exceeds the shear bond strength requirement as suggested by Matsumura et al. (>10 MPa). A statistically significant association between the test groups and the type of failure was observed.
越来越多的复合材料被用作铸造修复体贴面的替代品。本研究的目的是评估和比较基于UDMA的复合材料、修复性复合材料以及热固化丙烯酸树脂在贴附于镍铬合金时的剪切粘结强度,并评估粘结失败的类型。使用了三种不同的贴面材料:热固化丙烯酸树脂、基于UDMA的复合材料和一种修复性复合材料。制作了10个样本,每个样本分别使用热固化丙烯酸树脂和修复性复合材料,使用基于UDMA的复合材料制作了20个样本;因此,样本总数达到40个。所有样本都进行了剪切粘结应力断裂试验,并观察粘结失败的类型。当在固化过程中使用导热膏时,基于UDMA的复合材料记录到最高的平均剪切粘结强度(10.51MPa)。不使用导热膏的基于UDMA的复合材料(8.92MPa)、热固化丙烯酸树脂贴面材料(4.24MPa)和修复性复合材料(5.03MPa)的平均粘结强度值彼此有显著差异(p>0.05)。用热固化丙烯酸树脂贴面材料和修复性复合材料贴面的样本显示为粘结失败。用基于UDMA的复合材料贴面的样本显示为内聚性或主要为内聚性失败。当基于UDMA的复合材料贴面材料与热保护膏一起使用时,超过了Matsumura等人建议的剪切粘结强度要求(>10MPa)。观察到试验组与失败类型之间存在统计学上的显著关联。