Department of Neurobiology and the Pittsburgh Center for Pain Research, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(5):e1002524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002524. Epub 2012 May 24.
Pain caused by nerve injury (i.e. neuropathic pain) is associated with development of neuronal hyperexcitability at several points along the pain pathway. Within primary afferents, numerous injury-induced changes have been identified but it remains unclear which molecular changes are necessary and sufficient to explain cellular hyperexcitability. To investigate this, we built computational models that reproduce the switch from a normal spiking pattern characterized by a single spike at the onset of depolarization to a neuropathic one characterized by repetitive spiking throughout depolarization. Parameter changes that were sufficient to switch the spiking pattern also enabled membrane potential oscillations and bursting, suggesting that all three pathological changes are mechanistically linked. Dynamical analysis confirmed this prediction by showing that excitability changes co-develop when the nonlinear mechanism responsible for spike initiation switches from a quasi-separatrix-crossing to a subcritical Hopf bifurcation. This switch stems from biophysical changes that bias competition between oppositely directed fast- and slow-activating conductances operating at subthreshold potentials. Competition between activation and inactivation of a single conductance can be similarly biased with equivalent consequences for excitability. "Bias" can arise from a multitude of molecular changes occurring alone or in combination; in the latter case, changes can add or offset one another. Thus, our results identify pathological change in the nonlinear interaction between processes affecting spike initiation as the critical determinant of how simple injury-induced changes at the molecular level manifest complex excitability changes at the cellular level. We demonstrate that multiple distinct molecular changes are sufficient to produce neuropathic changes in excitability; however, given that nerve injury elicits numerous molecular changes that may be individually sufficient to alter spike initiation, our results argue that no single molecular change is necessary to produce neuropathic excitability. This deeper understanding of degenerate causal relationships has important implications for how we understand and treat neuropathic pain.
神经损伤引起的疼痛(即神经性疼痛)与疼痛通路中几个部位的神经元过度兴奋有关。在初级传入纤维中,已经确定了许多损伤诱导的变化,但仍不清楚哪些分子变化是必要和充分的,以解释细胞过度兴奋。为了研究这一点,我们构建了计算模型,这些模型再现了从正常放电模式(以去极化时的单个尖峰为特征)向神经性放电模式(以去极化时的重复放电为特征)的转变。足以改变放电模式的参数变化也使膜电位振荡和爆发成为可能,这表明所有三种病理变化在机制上是相互关联的。动态分析通过表明负责尖峰起始的非线性机制从准分界面穿越到亚临界 Hopf 分岔时兴奋性变化共同发展,证实了这一预测。这种转变源于偏向在亚阈值电位下运作的相反方向的快速和慢速激活电导之间竞争的生物物理变化。单个电导的激活和失活之间的竞争也可以以相同的方式偏向,对兴奋性产生等效的影响。“偏向”可以由单独发生或组合发生的多种分子变化引起;在后一种情况下,变化可以相互抵消或相互抵消。因此,我们的结果确定了影响尖峰起始的过程之间的非线性相互作用中的病理变化是分子水平上的简单损伤诱导变化如何在细胞水平上表现出复杂兴奋性变化的关键决定因素。我们证明,多种不同的分子变化足以产生兴奋性的神经性变化;然而,鉴于神经损伤引发的许多分子变化可能单独足以改变尖峰起始,我们的结果表明,没有单一的分子变化是产生神经性兴奋性所必需的。对退化因果关系的这种更深入理解对我们理解和治疗神经性疼痛具有重要意义。