Karandikar Mahesh, Mirza Sohail K, Song Kit, Yang Tong, Krengel Walter F, Spratt Kevin F, Avellino Anthony M
Department of Neurological Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012 Jun;9(6):594-601. doi: 10.3171/2012.2.PEDS11329.
The treatment of craniocervical instability in children is often challenging due to their small spine bones, complex anatomy, and unique syndromes. The authors discuss their surgical experience with 33 cases in the treatment of 31 children (≤ 17 years of age) with craniocervical spine instability using smaller nontraditional titanium screws and plates, as well as intraoperative CT.
All craniocervical fusion procedures were performed using intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging and electrophysiological monitoring. Nontraditional spine hardware included smaller screw sizes (2.4 and 2.7 mm) from the orthopedic hand/foot set and mandibular plates. Twenty-three of the 33 surgical procedures were performed with intraoperative CT, which was used to confirm adequate position of the spine hardware and alignment of the spine.
The mean patient age was 9.5 years (range 2-17 years). Eleven children underwent a posterior C1-2 transarticular screw fusion, 17 had an occipitocervical fusion, and 3 had a posterior subaxial cervical fusion. The follow-up duration ranged from 9 to 72 months (mean 53 months). All children demonstrated successful fusion at their 3-month follow-up visit, except 1 patient whose unilateral C1-2 transarticular screw fusion required a repeat surgery before proper fusion was achieved. Of the 47 C1-2 transarticular screws that were placed, 13 were 2.4 mm, 15 were 2.7 mm, 7 were 3.5 mm, and 12 were 4.0 mm. Eighteen of the 47 C1-2 transarticular screws were suboptimally placed. Eleven of these misplaced screws were removed and redirected within the same operation because these surgeries benefitted from the use of intraoperative CT; 6 of the 7 remaining suboptimally placed screws were left in place because a second surgery for screw replacement was not warranted. The other suboptimally placed C1-2 screw was replaced during a repeat operation due to failure of fusion. Use of intraoperative CT was invaluable because it enabled the authors to reposition suboptimal C1-2 transarticular screws without necessitating a second operation.
Successful craniocervical fusion procedures were achieved using smaller nontraditional titanium screws and plates. Intraoperative CT was a helpful adjunct for confirming and readjusting the trajectory of the screws prior to leaving the operating room, which decreases overall treatment costs and reduces complications.
由于儿童脊柱骨骼小、解剖结构复杂且有独特综合征,儿童颅颈交界区不稳的治疗常具有挑战性。作者讨论了他们使用较小的非传统钛螺钉和钢板以及术中CT治疗31例(≤17岁)颅颈交界区脊柱不稳患儿的33例手术经验。
所有颅颈融合手术均在术中透视成像和电生理监测下进行。非传统脊柱内固定器械包括骨科手足器械套装中的较小尺寸螺钉(2.4和2.7毫米)以及下颌骨钢板。33例手术中有23例在术中使用了CT,用于确认脊柱内固定器械的位置合适以及脊柱的对线情况。
患者平均年龄为9.5岁(范围2 - 17岁)。11例儿童接受了后路C1 - 2经关节螺钉融合术,17例进行了枕颈融合术,3例进行了后路下颈椎融合术。随访时间为9至72个月(平均53个月)。除1例单侧C1 - 2经关节螺钉融合术患者在实现恰当融合前需要再次手术外,所有儿童在3个月随访时均显示融合成功。在置入的47枚C1 - 2经关节螺钉中,13枚为2.4毫米,15枚为2.7毫米,7枚为3.5毫米,12枚为4.0毫米。47枚C1 - 2经关节螺钉中有18枚位置欠佳。其中11枚位置不当的螺钉在同一次手术中被取出并重新调整方向,因为这些手术受益于术中CT的使用;其余7枚位置欠佳的螺钉中有6枚留在原位,因为无需进行二次螺钉置换手术。另一枚位置欠佳的C1 - 2螺钉因融合失败在再次手术时被更换。术中CT的使用非常宝贵,因为它使作者能够在不进行二次手术的情况下重新调整欠佳的C1 - 2经关节螺钉轨迹。
使用较小的非传统钛螺钉和钢板实现了成功的颅颈融合手术。术中CT有助于在离开手术室前确认和调整螺钉轨迹,从而降低总体治疗成本并减少并发症。