• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用临床痴呆评定量表总分作为阿尔茨海默病临床试验主要结局指标的理由。

Rationale for use of the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes as a primary outcome measure for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.

机构信息

Cytokinetics, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Feb;9(1 Suppl):S45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.11.002. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.11.002
PMID:22658286
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We used the database of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) to explore the psychometric properties of the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) to consider its utility as an outcome measure for clinical trials in early and mild, as well as later, stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

We assessed internal consistency, structural validity, convergent validity, and 2-year internal and external responsiveness of the CDR-SB using data from 382 subjects with early or mild AD at entry into the ADNI study.

RESULTS

The CDR-SB assesses both cognitive and functional domains of AD disability. Mean scores declined nearly linearly; CDR-SB cognitive and functional subsums contributed equally to total scores at both very mild (early) and mild stages of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The CDR-SB has psychometric properties that make it attractive as a primary outcome measure that comprehensively assesses both cognitive and functional disability in AD patients. It may prove particularly useful for studies in early, predementia stages of AD.

摘要

背景

我们使用阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议 (ADNI) 的数据库来探索临床痴呆评定量表总和盒 (CDR-SB) 的心理计量学特性,以考虑其作为临床试验在早期和轻度,以及后期阶段阿尔茨海默病 (AD) 的结局测量的效用。

方法

我们使用 ADNI 研究中 382 名早期或轻度 AD 患者的入组数据评估 CDR-SB 的内部一致性、结构效度、收敛效度以及 2 年的内部和外部反应性。

结果

CDR-SB 评估了 AD 残疾的认知和功能领域。平均得分呈近线性下降;在疾病的极轻度(早期)和轻度阶段,CDR-SB 的认知和功能子量表对总分的贡献相等。

结论

CDR-SB 具有心理计量学特性,使其作为全面评估 AD 患者认知和功能障碍的主要结局测量具有吸引力。它可能在 AD 的早期、前驱期阶段的研究中特别有用。

相似文献

1
Rationale for use of the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes as a primary outcome measure for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.使用临床痴呆评定量表总分作为阿尔茨海默病临床试验主要结局指标的理由。
Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Feb;9(1 Suppl):S45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.11.002. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
2
Suitability of the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes as a single primary endpoint for Alzheimer's disease trials.临床痴呆评定量表-盒式评分作为阿尔茨海默病试验单一主要终点的适宜性。
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 Nov;7(6):602-610.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
3
Predicting the time to clinically worsening in mild cognitive impairment patients and its utility in clinical trial design by modeling a longitudinal clinical dementia rating sum of boxes from the ADNI database.通过对阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)数据库中的纵向临床痴呆评定量表框和总和进行建模,预测轻度认知障碍患者临床病情恶化的时间及其在临床试验设计中的效用。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;40(4):967-79. doi: 10.3233/JAD-132090.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes and Other Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in a Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease Population.临床痴呆评定量表-框总和及其它认知和功能结局在前驱期阿尔茨海默病人群中的心理测量特性。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(2):151-160. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2020.73.
5
Development of a straightforward and sensitive scale for MCI and early AD clinical trials.用于 MCI 和早期 AD 临床试验的简便而敏感量表的制定。
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Apr;11(4):404-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
6
Detecting Treatment Group Differences in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials: A Comparison of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB).阿尔茨海默病临床试验中治疗组差异的检测:阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知分量表(ADAS-Cog)与临床痴呆评定量表-总盒分(CDR-SB)的比较。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2018;5(1):15-20. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2018.2.
7
Current Landscape of Late-Phase Clinical Trials for Alzheimer's Disease: Comparing Regional Variation Between Subjects in Japan and North America.阿尔茨海默病晚期临床试验的现状:比较日本和北美国受试者之间的地区差异。
Pharmaceut Med. 2019 Dec;33(6):511-518. doi: 10.1007/s40290-019-00306-y.
8
Stages of Objective Memory Impairment Predict Alzheimer's Disease Neuropathology: Comparison with the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes.客观记忆损伤阶段预测阿尔茨海默病神经病理学:与临床痴呆评定量表-框总数的比较。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(1):185-195. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200946.
9
Progression of Alzheimer's disease during a three-year follow-up using the CERAD-NB total score: Kuopio ALSOVA study.使用 CERAD-NB 总分对阿尔茨海默病进行为期三年的随访:库奥皮奥 ALSOVA 研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Aug;25(8):1335-44. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000653. Epub 2013 May 16.
10
Validity of the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes in Staging and Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Mexican Americans.《临床痴呆评定量表盒式评分在墨西哥裔美国人认知障碍分期和检测中的有效性》
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2022 Jan;35(1):128-134. doi: 10.1177/0891988720973755. Epub 2020 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical progression on CDR-SB©: Progression-free time at each 0.5 unit level in dominantly inherited and sporadic Alzheimer's disease populations.基于CDR-SB©的临床进展:显性遗传和散发性阿尔茨海默病群体中每0.5单位水平的无进展时间。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Sep;21(9):e70643. doi: 10.1002/alz.70643.
2
Metabolic Remapping at "Point-Line-Plane" Levels With Central Dysfunction in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease.脑小血管病伴中枢功能障碍时“点-线-面”水平的代谢重映射
Brain Behav. 2025 Aug;15(8):e70773. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70773.
3
Extension and external validation of mapping between the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Clinical Dementia Rating scale in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
阿尔茨海默病患者简易精神状态检查表与临床痴呆评定量表之间映射关系的扩展及外部验证
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Jun;21(6):e70163. doi: 10.1002/alz.70163.
4
Clinical evaluation of medicines for patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease in Japan.日本针对轻度认知障碍及阿尔茨海默病所致轻度痴呆患者的药物临床评估
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 May 13;11(2):e70100. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70100. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
5
Clinical Progression on CDR-SB: Progression Free Time at Each 0.5-unit Level in Dominantly Inherited and Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease Populations.CDR-SB的临床进展:显性遗传和散发性阿尔茨海默病群体中每0.5个单位水平的无进展时间
medRxiv. 2025 Feb 20:2025.02.17.25322322. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.17.25322322.
6
A 52-week, open-label, observational study evaluating tolerability, efficacy and physicians satisfaction of rivastigmine oral solution in Alzheimer's disease in Taiwan.一项为期52周的开放性观察性研究,评估卡巴拉汀口服溶液在台湾阿尔茨海默病患者中的耐受性、疗效及医生满意度。
J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2025 Jan 15;9:25424823241311860. doi: 10.1177/25424823241311860. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
Uncovering cerebral blood flow patterns corresponding to Amyloid-beta accumulations in patients across the Alzheimer's disease continuum using the arterial spin labeling.利用动脉自旋标记技术揭示阿尔茨海默病连续体患者中与β淀粉样蛋白积累相对应的脑血流模式。
Neurol Sci. 2025 May;46(5):2081-2090. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-07992-4. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
8
Impact of shortening time on diagnosis of F-florbetaben PET.缩短时间对F-氟代硼替佐米正电子发射断层扫描(PET)诊断的影响。
EJNMMI Res. 2024 Nov 21;14(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13550-024-01181-8.
9
Informant characteristics influence Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores-based staging of Alzheimer's disease.信息提供者特征影响基于临床痴呆评定量表总分的阿尔茨海默病分期。
Nat Aging. 2024 Nov;4(11):1538-1543. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00732-x. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
10
Reliability of the assessment of the clinical dementia rating scale from the analysis of medical records in comparison with the reference method.从病历分析评估临床痴呆评定量表与参考方法的可靠性比较。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024 Sep 5;16(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01567-9.