• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床痴呆评定量表-框总和及其它认知和功能结局在前驱期阿尔茨海默病人群中的心理测量特性。

Psychometric Properties of the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes and Other Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in a Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease Population.

机构信息

Fiona McDougall, Genentech 620 E Grand Ave, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA,

出版信息

J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(2):151-160. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2020.73.

DOI:10.14283/jpad.2020.73
PMID:33569561
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) has been proposed as a primary outcome for use in prodromal AD trials. However, the psychometric properties of this, and of other commonly used measures, have not been well-established in this patient population.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the psychometric properties of commonly used efficacy measures in a clinical trial of prodromal AD.

SETTING

Data were gathered as part of a two-year clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients had biomarker confirmed prodromal AD.

MEASUREMENTS

Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognition Subscale 11 and 13 (ADAS-Cog), Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), and Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT-IR [words]). Assessments were conducted at least every 24 weeks.

RESULTS

For the CDR-SB, test-retest reliability was good (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.83); internal consistency was 0.65 at baseline but above 0.8 at later assessments. Relationships between the CDR-SB and other measures were as expected (higher correlations with more closely related constructs), and the CDR-SB differentiated between patients with different severities of dementia (-2.9 points difference between CDR-Global Score 0.5 and 1, P<.0001). Floor and ceiling effects on the CDR-SB total score were minimal; however, at baseline there were ceiling effects in the personal care domain. Further detail is provided on the psychometric properties of ADAS-Cog, MMSE, FCSRT-IR and FAQ in this population.

CONCLUSION

The psychometric properties of the CDR-SB are adequate in prodromal AD and continued use is warranted in clinical trials. However, there remains scope for improvement in the assessment of functional constructs and development of novel measures should continue.

摘要

背景

临床痴呆评定量表-和箱式测验(CDR-SB)已被提议作为用于前驱期 AD 试验的主要结局指标。然而,在该患者人群中,尚未很好地确定该量表和其他常用量表的心理测量特性。

目的

描述前驱期 AD 临床试验中常用疗效指标的心理测量特性。

设置

数据是作为为期两年的临床试验的一部分收集的。

参与者

患者具有生物标志物确认的前驱期 AD。

测量

临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)、功能活动问卷(FAQ)、阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知分量表 11 和 13(ADAS-Cog)、简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和自由和线索选择性提醒测试(FCSRT-IR[词])。评估至少每 24 周进行一次。

结果

对于 CDR-SB,重测信度良好(组内相关系数[ICC]=0.83);基线时的内部一致性为 0.65,但在后期评估中高于 0.8。CDR-SB 与其他测量指标之间的关系符合预期(与更密切相关的结构相关性更高),并且 CDR-SB 区分了不同痴呆严重程度的患者(CDR-全球评分 0.5 和 1 之间相差 2.9 分,P<.0001)。CDR-SB 总分的地板和天花板效应最小;然而,在基线时,个人护理领域存在天花板效应。在该人群中,还提供了 ADAS-Cog、MMSE、FCSRT-IR 和 FAQ 的心理测量特性的详细信息。

结论

CDR-SB 在前驱期 AD 中的心理测量特性良好,在临床试验中继续使用是合理的。然而,在评估功能结构方面仍有改进的空间,应继续开发新的测量工具。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes and Other Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in a Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease Population.临床痴呆评定量表-框总和及其它认知和功能结局在前驱期阿尔茨海默病人群中的心理测量特性。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(2):151-160. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2020.73.
2
An Arabic Version of the Cognitive Subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog): Reliability, Validity, and Normative Data.阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知分量表(ADAS-Cog)的阿拉伯文版本:信度、效度和常模数据。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(1):11-21. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170222.
3
Detecting Treatment Group Differences in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials: A Comparison of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB).阿尔茨海默病临床试验中治疗组差异的检测:阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知分量表(ADAS-Cog)与临床痴呆评定量表-总盒分(CDR-SB)的比较。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2018;5(1):15-20. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2018.2.
4
Suitability of the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes as a single primary endpoint for Alzheimer's disease trials.临床痴呆评定量表-盒式评分作为阿尔茨海默病试验单一主要终点的适宜性。
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 Nov;7(6):602-610.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
5
Evaluation of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of orally administered BI 409306, a novel phosphodiesterase type 9 inhibitor, in two randomised controlled phase II studies in patients with prodromal and mild Alzheimer's disease.评价新型磷酸二酯酶 9 抑制剂 BI 409306 口服制剂在伴有前驱期和轻度阿尔茨海默病的患者中进行的两项随机对照 2 期研究中的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019 Feb 12;11(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0467-2.
6
Effects of intensive lifestyle changes on the progression of mild cognitive impairment or early dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.强化生活方式改变对阿尔茨海默病所致轻度认知障碍或早期痴呆进展的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024 Jun 7;16(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01482-z.
7
Longitudinal Exposure-Response Modeling of Multiple Indicators of Alzheimer's Disease Progression.阿尔茨海默病进展多项指标的纵向暴露-反应建模。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(2):212-222. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2023.13.
8
Minimal clinically important difference in Alzheimer's disease: Rapid review.阿尔茨海默病的最小临床重要差异:快速综述。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 May;20(5):3352-3363. doi: 10.1002/alz.13770. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
9
Stages of Objective Memory Impairment Predict Alzheimer's Disease Neuropathology: Comparison with the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes.客观记忆损伤阶段预测阿尔茨海默病神经病理学:与临床痴呆评定量表-框总数的比较。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(1):185-195. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200946.
10
Psychometric evaluation of ADAS-Cog and NTB for measuring drug response.ADAS-Cog 和 NTB 量表用于测量药物反应的心理计量学评估。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2014 Feb;129(2):114-22. doi: 10.1111/ane.12153. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomarker Profile in Peripheral Blood Cells Related to Alzheimer's Disease.与阿尔茨海默病相关的外周血细胞生物标志物谱
Mol Neurobiol. 2025 Mar 10. doi: 10.1007/s12035-025-04767-y.
2
Real-world datasets for the International Registry for Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias (InRAD) and other registries: An international consensus.国际阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症登记处(InRAD)及其他登记处的真实世界数据集:一项国际共识。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Apr;12(4):100096. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100096. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
3
Associations Between Metabolomics Findings and Brain Hypometabolism in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.
轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病中代谢组学研究结果与脑代谢减低之间的关联
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2024;21(9):679-689. doi: 10.2174/0115672050350196250110092338.
4
Development of a General Composite Scale (GENCOMS) for Progressive Neurodegenerative Diseases and Implications for the Assessment of Disease-Modifying Therapies.用于进行性神经退行性疾病的通用综合量表(GENCOMS)的开发及其对疾病修饰疗法评估的意义。
Neurol Ther. 2024 Dec;13(6):1627-1639. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00661-2. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
5
Care partner-informed meaningful change thresholds for the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes for trials of early Alzheimer's disease.用于早期阿尔茨海默病试验的临床痴呆评定量表-框总数的照顾者知情有意义的变化阈值。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Sep;20(9):5889-5900. doi: 10.1002/alz.14050. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
6
Subjective Cognitive Decline in Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Objectively Normal Cognition: Mediation by Depression and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living.认知功能客观正常的社区居住老年人的主观认知衰退:抑郁和日常生活工具性活动的中介作用
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Jun;21(6):583-589. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0403. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
7
How to provide existential and spiritual support to people with mild to moderate dementia and their loved ones. A pilot study.如何为轻度至中度痴呆症患者及其家属提供存在和精神支持。一项试点研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 27;19(3):e0298783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298783. eCollection 2024.
8
Progression analysis versus traditional methods to quantify slowing of disease progression in Alzheimer's disease.进展分析与传统方法定量阿尔茨海默病疾病进展减缓的比较。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024 Feb 29;16(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01413-y.
9
Precision medicine analysis of heterogeneity in individual-level treatment response to amyloid beta removal in early Alzheimer's disease.精准医学分析早期阿尔茨海默病患者个体对淀粉样蛋白β清除治疗反应的异质性。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Feb;20(2):1102-1111. doi: 10.1002/alz.13431. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
10
Exploring the relationship between patient-relevant outcomes and Alzheimer's disease progression assessed using the clinical dementia rating scale: a systematic literature review.探索使用临床痴呆评定量表评估的与患者相关的结局与阿尔茨海默病进展之间的关系:一项系统文献综述。
Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 17;14:1208802. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1208802. eCollection 2023.