• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and cross-validation of the in-hospital mortality prediction in advanced cancer patients score: a preliminary study.晚期癌症患者住院死亡率预测评分的制定与验证:初步研究。
J Palliat Med. 2012 Aug;15(8):902-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0437. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
2
Symptom burden and characteristics of patients who die in the acute palliative care unit of a tertiary cancer center.在一家三级癌症中心的急性姑息治疗病房去世的患者的症状负担和特征。
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;9(2):216-223. doi: 10.21037/apm.2020.02.06. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
3
Predictors of inpatient mortality in an acute palliative care unit at a comprehensive cancer center.综合性癌症中心急性姑息治疗病房住院患者死亡的预测因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Jan;18(1):67-76. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0631-5. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
4
Symptom Expression in the Last Seven Days of Life Among Cancer Patients Admitted to Acute Palliative Care Units.入住急性姑息治疗病房的癌症患者生命最后七天的症状表现
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Oct;50(4):488-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
5
Discharge outcomes and survival of patients with advanced cancer admitted to an acute palliative care unit at a comprehensive cancer center.综合癌症中心急性姑息治疗病房收治的晚期癌症患者的出院结局和生存情况。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Jan;13(1):49-57. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0166.
6
Factors associated with discharge disposition on an acute palliative care unit.与急性姑息治疗病房出院去向相关的因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Nov;26(11):3951-3958. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4274-2. Epub 2018 May 30.
7
Characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to the acute palliative care unit from the emergency center.从急诊中心收治至急性姑息治疗病房的患者的特征与结局
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jun;47(6):1028-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.07.015. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
8
The Frequency, Characteristics, and Outcomes Among Cancer Patients With Delirium Admitted to an Acute Palliative Care Unit.入住急性姑息治疗病房的谵妄癌症患者的发生率、特征及结局
Oncologist. 2015 Dec;20(12):1425-31. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0115. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
9
Clinical Outcomes of Operating an Acute Palliative Care Unit at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.综合癌症中心开设急性姑息治疗病房的临床效果。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 Oct;18(10):e1661-e1671. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00163. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
10
[Analysis of 28 day-mortality risk factors in sepsis patients and construction and validation of predictive model].[脓毒症患者28天死亡风险因素分析及预测模型的构建与验证]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 May;36(5):478-484. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20231109-00961.

引用本文的文献

1
Engagement, Advance Care Planning, and Hospice Use in a Telephonic Nurse-Led Palliative Care Program for Persons Living with Advanced Cancer.针对晚期癌症患者的电话护士主导姑息治疗项目中的参与度、预先护理计划及临终关怀使用情况
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 15;15(8):2310. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082310.
2
Evaluating High-Dimensional Machine Learning Models to Predict Hospital Mortality Among Older Patients With Cancer.评估高维机器学习模型预测老年癌症患者的医院死亡率。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Jun;6:e2100186. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00186.
3
Challenges in virtual collection of patient-reported data: a prospective cohort study conducted in COVID-19 era.虚拟收集患者报告数据的挑战:在 COVID-19 时代进行的前瞻性队列研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7535-7544. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07191-3. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
4
Data from emergency medicine palliative care access (EMPallA): a randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of specialty outpatient versus telephonic palliative care of older adults with advanced illness presenting to the emergency department.来自急诊姑息治疗准入(EMPallA)的数据:一项比较专科门诊与电话姑息治疗对因急症就诊的老年晚期疾病患者的有效性的随机对照试验。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 12;21(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00478-4.
5
Could symptom burden predict subsequent healthcare use in patients with end stage kidney disease on hemodialysis care? A prospective, preliminary study.症状负担能否预测终末期肾病血液透析患者的后续医疗保健使用?一项前瞻性初步研究。
Ren Fail. 2020 Nov;42(1):294-301. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2020.1744449.
6
The incidence and prevalence of delirium across palliative care settings: A systematic review.在姑息治疗环境中谵妄的发生率和流行率:系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):865-877. doi: 10.1177/0269216319854944. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
7
Nomogram-based parameters to predict overall survival in a real-world advanced cancer population undergoing palliative care.基于列线图的参数预测接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者的总生存期。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jun 5;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0432-7.
8
Benzodiazepines for agitation in patients with delirium: selecting the right patient, right time, and right indication.用于谵妄患者躁动的苯二氮䓬类药物:选择合适的患者、合适的时间和合适的适应证。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018 Dec;12(4):489-494. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000395.
9
Prognostic evaluation in palliative care: final results from a prospective cohort study.姑息治疗中的预后评估:一项前瞻性队列研究的最终结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jun;27(6):2095-2102. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4463-z. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
10
Factors associated with discharge disposition on an acute palliative care unit.与急性姑息治疗病房出院去向相关的因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Nov;26(11):3951-3958. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4274-2. Epub 2018 May 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的疾病严重程度评分系统。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):163-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f96f81.
2
Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的早期姑息治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):733-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000678.
3
Integrating supportive and palliative care in the trajectory of cancer: establishing goals and models of care.在癌症病程中整合支持性护理与姑息治疗:确立护理目标与模式
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 1;28(25):4013-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.5618. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
4
Availability and integration of palliative care at US cancer centers.美国癌症中心姑息治疗的可及性和整合。
JAMA. 2010 Mar 17;303(11):1054-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.258.
5
Antineoplastic therapy use in patients with advanced cancer admitted to an acute palliative care unit at a comprehensive cancer center: a simultaneous care model.在综合癌症中心的急性姑息治疗病房收治的晚期癌症患者中使用抗肿瘤治疗:一种同步护理模式。
Cancer. 2010 Apr 15;116(8):2036-43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24942.
6
Neuroleptic dose in the management of delirium in patients with advanced cancer.在晚期癌症患者谵妄管理中使用的神经安定剂量。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Feb;39(2):186-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.07.009.
7
Discharge outcomes and survival of patients with advanced cancer admitted to an acute palliative care unit at a comprehensive cancer center.综合癌症中心急性姑息治疗病房收治的晚期癌症患者的出院结局和生存情况。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Jan;13(1):49-57. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0166.
8
Goals of care and end-of-life decision making for hospitalized patients at a canadian tertiary care cancer center.加拿大一家癌症专科医院住院患者的治疗目标和临终决策。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Dec;38(6):871-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.017.
9
Nurse and physician inter-rater agreement of three performance status measures in palliative care outpatients.护士和医生在姑息治疗门诊患者中对三种功能状态测量工具的评定者间一致性。
Support Care Cancer. 2010 May;18(5):609-16. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0700-9. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
10
Predictors of inpatient mortality in an acute palliative care unit at a comprehensive cancer center.综合性癌症中心急性姑息治疗病房住院患者死亡的预测因素。
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Jan;18(1):67-76. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0631-5. Epub 2009 Apr 7.

晚期癌症患者住院死亡率预测评分的制定与验证:初步研究。

Development and cross-validation of the in-hospital mortality prediction in advanced cancer patients score: a preliminary study.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2012 Aug;15(8):902-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0437. Epub 2012 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2011.0437
PMID:22663175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3462411/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Acute palliative care units (APCUs) provide intensive symptom support and transition of care for advanced cancer patients. Better understanding of the predictors of in-hospital mortality is needed to facilitate program planning and patient care. In this prospective study, we identified predictors of APCU mortality, and developed a four-item In-hospital Mortality Prediction in Advanced Cancer Patients (IMPACT) predictive model.

METHODS

Between April and July 2010, we documented baseline demographics, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), 80 clinical signs including known prognostic factors, and 26 acute complications on admission in consecutive APCU patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors for inclusion in a nomogram, which was cross-validated with bootstrap analysis.

RESULTS

Among 151 consecutive patients, the median age was 58, 13 (9%) had hematologic malignancies, and 52 (34%) died in the hospital. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with in-hospital mortality were advanced education (odds ration [OR]=11.8, p=0.002), hematologic malignancies (OR=8.6, p=0.02), delirium (OR=4.3, p=0.02), and high ESAS global distress score (OR=20.8, p=0.01). In a nomogram based on these four factors, total scores of 6, 10, 14, 17, and 21 corresponded to a risk of death of 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 90%, respectively. The model has 92% sensitivity and 88% specificity for predicting patients at low/high risk of dying in the hospital, and a receiver-operator characteristic curve concordance index of 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher education was associated with increased utilization of the interdisciplinary palliative care unit until at the end of life. Patients with higher symptom burden, delirium, and hematologic malignancies were also more likely to require APCU care until death.

摘要

目的

急性姑息治疗病房(APCUs)为晚期癌症患者提供强化症状支持和护理过渡。为了便于规划项目和患者护理,需要更好地了解院内死亡率的预测因素。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们确定了 APCU 死亡率的预测因素,并开发了一个四项目的先进癌症患者院内死亡预测(IMPACT)预测模型。

方法

在 2010 年 4 月至 7 月期间,我们记录了连续入住 APCU 的患者的基线人口统计学数据、埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS)、80 种临床体征(包括已知的预后因素)和 26 种急性并发症。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定纳入列线图的因素,并用 bootstrap 分析进行交叉验证。

结果

在 151 例连续患者中,中位年龄为 58 岁,13 例(9%)患有血液恶性肿瘤,52 例(34%)在院内死亡。多变量分析显示,与院内死亡相关的因素包括高等教育(比值比[OR]=11.8,p=0.002)、血液恶性肿瘤(OR=8.6,p=0.02)、谵妄(OR=4.3,p=0.02)和 ESAS 全球困扰评分高(OR=20.8,p=0.01)。在基于这四个因素的列线图中,总分 6、10、14、17 和 21 分别对应于 10%、25%、50%、75%和 90%的死亡风险。该模型对低/高院内死亡风险患者的预测具有 92%的敏感性和 88%的特异性,受试者工作特征曲线一致性指数为 83%。

结论

高等教育与姑息治疗团队的使用增加有关,直到生命的最后阶段。症状负担较高、谵妄和血液恶性肿瘤的患者也更有可能需要 APCU 护理直至死亡。