Social Medicine and Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Sweden.
Glob Health Action. 2012;5:17271. doi: 10.3402/gha.v5i0.17271. Epub 2012 May 30.
Policies that empower individuals and communities may be appropriate for public health, and more broadly. Simple, transparent and acceptable tools are therefore required to evaluate policies from an empowerment perspective. In 2008, the South African Department of Health (DOHSA) drafted a policy to endorse the integration of African Traditional Medicine (ATM) into the public health sector, following the World Health Organization's (WHO) long-standing directives.
The purpose of this study is to critically analyze this policy using a novel evaluation tool.
A 12-point 'Policy Empowerment Index' (PEI) is introduced, and used to classify and score the policy according to five theoretical policy types. The evaluation was based on a stepwise review and associated publications: policy drafts, policy statements and news announcements.
According to the assessment tool, the ATM policy was marginally 'supportive' of constituent empowerment, although several 'directive' features were also observed. The importance of ATM to SA's communities and the promotion of education, employment, entrepreneurship and peripheral resource mobilization were the main empowering elements. Centralised conception, planning and implementation, the absence of provisions for local adaptations and the authoritative legislation context were sub-optimal features.
South Africa's ATM legislation may need to further involve communities in policy design and implementation to capitalise upon the broader benefits of community empowerment. However, the iterative nature of method and evaluation is important. Indeed, they are proposed as points to initiate participatory development, and improve policy evaluation. Such instruments can empower constituents in the political process.
赋予个人和社区权力的政策可能适合公共卫生领域,甚至更广泛的领域。因此,需要简单、透明和可接受的工具来从赋权的角度评估政策。2008 年,南非卫生部(DOHSA)根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的长期指令,起草了一项政策,支持将非洲传统医学(ATM)纳入公共卫生部门。
本研究旨在使用新的评估工具对该政策进行批判性分析。
引入了一个 12 分的“政策赋权指数”(PEI),并根据五种理论政策类型对政策进行分类和评分。评估基于逐步审查和相关出版物:政策草案、政策声明和新闻公告。
根据评估工具,ATM 政策对组成部分的赋权略有“支持”,尽管也观察到了一些“指令”特征。ATM 对南非社区的重要性以及对教育、就业、创业和外围资源动员的促进是主要的赋权要素。集中的概念、规划和实施、缺乏地方适应的规定以及权威的立法背景是不太理想的特征。
南非的 ATM 立法可能需要进一步让社区参与政策设计和实施,以充分利用社区赋权的更广泛利益。然而,方法和评估的迭代性质很重要。事实上,它们被提议作为启动参与式发展和改进政策评估的起点。这些工具可以赋予政治进程中的选民权力。