Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Clinical and Experimental Immunology and Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2012 Dec;43(3):211-9. doi: 10.1007/s12016-012-8320-4.
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are traditionally detected by an indirect immunofluorescence technique. According to the international consensus on ANCA testing, ANCA should also be tested by antigen-specific tests for myeloperoxidase-ANCA and proteinase 3-ANCA. The direct noncompetitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) used to be the method of choice. Nowadays, these assays are called "first-generation" assays. Second-generation tests (capture ELISA) or third-generation tests (anchor ELISA) are more sensitive and specific for ANCA testing. We postulate that ANCA as detected by these newer ANCA tests may replace the need to perform indirect immunofluorescence-based assays. For classification of patients, ANCA serotype seems more important than classifying patients according to their clinical subtype, since genetics, clinical manifestations and response to therapy are more related to ANCA serotype than to clinical subtype. Detection of ANCA to monitor disease activity is still a controversial issue. Treatment based on ANCA levels is at present only experimentally performed in those patients who are treated with B-cell depletion therapy with rituximab. Future studies are needed to establish whether this way of monitoring patients is warranted.
抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体(ANCA)传统上通过间接免疫荧光技术进行检测。根据 ANCA 检测的国际共识,还应通过髓过氧化物酶-ANCA 和蛋白酶 3-ANCA 的抗原特异性检测来检测 ANCA。直接非竞争性酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)曾经是首选方法。如今,这些检测方法被称为“第一代”检测。第二代检测(捕获 ELISA)或第三代检测(锚定 ELISA)对于 ANCA 检测更敏感和特异。我们假设这些更新的 ANCA 检测方法检测到的 ANCA 可能取代间接免疫荧光检测的需要。对于患者的分类,ANCA 血清型似乎比根据临床亚型对患者进行分类更重要,因为遗传学、临床表现和对治疗的反应与 ANCA 血清型的关系比与临床亚型的关系更密切。检测 ANCA 以监测疾病活动仍然是一个有争议的问题。基于 ANCA 水平的治疗目前仅在接受利妥昔单抗的 B 细胞耗竭治疗的患者中进行实验。需要进一步的研究来确定这种监测患者的方法是否合理。