Phillips Jennifer A, Gabay Michael P, Ficzere Cathy, Ward Kristina E
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University Chicago College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Jun;46(6):793-801. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q813. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
The drug information curriculum in US colleges of pharmacy continues to evolve. The American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) Drug Information Practice and Research Network (DI PRN) published an opinion paper with specific recommendations regarding drug information education in 2009. Adoption of these recommendations has not been evaluated.
To assess which recommendations made in the ACCP DI PRN opinion paper are included in US pharmacy school curricula and characterize faculty qualifications, educational methods, and recent changes in drug information education.
An electronic survey was designed using the ACCP DI PRN opinion paper and the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education standards and guidelines for accreditation of PharmD programs in the US. Survey questions addressed curricular content within the following categories: drug information, literature evaluation, and biostatistics. A letter including the online survey link was sent via email to the dean of each US college/school of pharmacy (N = 128). Recipients were instructed to forward the email to the individual at their institution who was the most knowledgeable about the content and methodology used for didactic drug information education.
Sixty-four responses were included in the final analysis. Of the 19 ACCP DI PRN minimum core concepts, 9 (47%) were included in curricula of all responding institutions; 14 of 19 (74%) were included in curricula for all but 1 institution. In contrast, 5 of 16 concepts (31%) were not formally taught by a number of institutions. Many respondents noted an increased focus on evidence-based medicine, medication safety, and informatics.
Although a survey of drug information curricula documented substantial inclusion of the essential concepts presented in the ACCP DI PRN opinion paper, room for improvement remains in drug information curricula in US colleges of pharmacy.
美国药学院校的药物信息课程持续发展。美国临床药学会(ACCP)药物信息实践与研究网络(DI PRN)在2009年发表了一篇关于药物信息教育的意见书并提出了具体建议。这些建议的采纳情况尚未得到评估。
评估美国药学院校课程中纳入了ACCP DI PRN意见书里的哪些建议,并描述教师资质、教育方法以及药物信息教育的近期变化。
根据ACCP DI PRN意见书以及美国药学教育认证委员会(ACPE)关于药学博士项目认证的标准和指南设计了一项电子调查问卷。调查问题涉及以下几类课程内容:药物信息、文献评估和生物统计学。一封包含在线调查链接的信件通过电子邮件发送给了美国每所药学院校(N = 128)的院长。收件人被要求将电子邮件转发给其所在机构中对药物信息教学内容和方法最了解的个人。
最终分析纳入了64份回复。在ACCP DI PRN的19个最低核心概念中,9个(47%)被纳入了所有回复机构的课程;19个中的14个(74%)被纳入了除1所机构外所有机构的课程。相比之下,16个概念中的5个(31%)未被许多机构正式教授。许多受访者指出,对循证医学、用药安全和信息学的关注有所增加。
尽管对药物信息课程的调查表明,ACCP DI PRN意见书里提出的基本概念在很大程度上被纳入其中,但美国药学院校的药物信息课程仍有改进空间。