Suppr超能文献

非人灵长类动物中同种面部空间的组织

The organization of conspecific face space in nonhuman primates.

作者信息

Parr Lisa A, Taubert Jessica, Little Anthony C, Hancock Peter J B

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Yerkes National Primate Research Center and Center for Translational Social Neuroscience, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(12):2411-34. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.693110. Epub 2012 Jun 7.

Abstract

Humans and chimpanzees demonstrate numerous cognitive specializations for processing faces, but comparative studies with monkeys suggest that these may be the result of recent evolutionary adaptations. The present study utilized the novel approach of face space, a powerful theoretical framework used to understand the representation of face identity in humans, to further explore species differences in face processing. According to the theory, faces are represented by vectors in a multidimensional space, the centre of which is defined by an average face. Each dimension codes features important for describing a face's identity, and vector length codes the feature's distinctiveness. Chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys discriminated male and female conspecifics' faces, rated by humans for their distinctiveness, using a computerized task. Multidimensional scaling analyses showed that the organization of face space was similar between humans and chimpanzees. Distinctive faces had the longest vectors and were the easiest for chimpanzees to discriminate. In contrast, distinctiveness did not correlate with the performance of rhesus monkeys. The feature dimensions for each species' face space were visualized and described using morphing techniques. These results confirm species differences in the perceptual representation of conspecific faces, which are discussed within an evolutionary framework.

摘要

人类和黑猩猩在处理面孔方面表现出众多认知专长,但与猴子的比较研究表明,这些可能是近期进化适应的结果。本研究采用了面部空间这一新颖方法,这是一个用于理解人类面孔身份表征的强大理论框架,以进一步探索面孔处理中的物种差异。根据该理论,面孔由多维空间中的向量表示,其中心由平均面孔定义。每个维度编码对于描述面孔身份很重要的特征,向量长度编码该特征的独特性。黑猩猩和恒河猴使用计算机化任务辨别由人类评定其独特性的同种雄性和雌性面孔。多维标度分析表明,人类和黑猩猩之间的面部空间组织相似。独特的面孔具有最长的向量,并且对黑猩猩来说最容易辨别。相比之下,独特性与恒河猴的表现不相关。使用变形技术对面孔空间的每个物种的特征维度进行了可视化和描述。这些结果证实了同种面孔感知表征中的物种差异,并在进化框架内进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
The organization of conspecific face space in nonhuman primates.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(12):2411-34. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.693110. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
2
The inversion effect reveals species differences in face processing.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):204-10. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
3
Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.
J Comp Psychol. 2008 Nov;122(4):390-402. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.4.390.
4
The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 7;278(1714):1964-72. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2333. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
5
Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
Anim Cogn. 2011 Jan;14(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0341-x. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
7
The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
J Comp Psychol. 2012 Nov;126(4):339-46. doi: 10.1037/a0027287. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
9
How the Thatcher illusion reveals evolutionary differences in the face processing of primates.
Anim Cogn. 2013 Sep;16(5):691-700. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0604-4. Epub 2013 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Colour matters more than shape for chimpanzees' recognition of developmental face changes.
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 23;10(1):18201. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75284-2.
2
Exploring the cerebral substrate of voice perception in primate brains.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jan 6;375(1789):20180386. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0386. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
4
Commentary: The Code for Facial Identity in the Primate Brain.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Nov 14;11:550. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00550. eCollection 2017.
5
Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey.
Curr Biol. 2017 Aug 21;27(16):2505-2509.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.075. Epub 2017 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The inversion effect reveals species differences in face processing.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):204-10. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
2
The Shaping of the Face Space in Early Infancy: Becoming a Native Face Processor.
Child Dev Perspect. 2010 Dec 1;4(3):205-211. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00147.x.
3
The evolution of face processing in primates.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 12;366(1571):1764-77. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0358.
4
Stable face representations.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 12;366(1571):1671-83. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0379.
5
The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 7;278(1714):1964-72. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2333. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
7
Dynamic norm-based encoding for unfamiliar shapes in human visual cortex.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jul;23(7):1829-43. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21559. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
8
Four-to-six-year-old children use norm-based coding in face-space.
J Vis. 2010 May 1;10(5):18. doi: 10.1167/10.5.18.
9
A multidimensional scaling analysis of own- and cross-race face spaces.
Cognition. 2010 Aug;116(2):283-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.001. Epub 2010 May 23.
10
Probing the face-space of individuals with prosopagnosia.
Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1828-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.007. Epub 2010 Mar 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验