Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚原住民健康研究的文献计量分析,1972-2008 年。

A bibliometric analysis of research on Indigenous health in Australia, 1972-2008.

机构信息

Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012 Jun;36(3):269-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00806.x. Epub 2012 Jan 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the growth patterns and citation volume of research publications referring to Indigenous health in Australia from 1972 to 2008 compared to seven selected health fields.

METHODS

Web of Science was used to identify all publications (n=820) referring to the health of Indigenous Australians authored by Australian researchers, 1972 to 2008. Citations for each publication were also captured. Growth was compared with selected health fields as well as with overall Australian research publications.

RESULTS

Research publications referring to Indigenous health, while remaining relatively small in number, grew at an average annual rate of 14.1%, compared with 8.2% across all fields of Australian research. The growth rate shown was equal second highest in our seven categories of health and medical research. However, Indigenous publications were cited significantly less than the Australian average.

CONCLUSIONS

While there has been positive growth in publications referring to Indigenous health, the attention paid to this research through citations remains disappointingly low.

IMPLICATIONS

Given that research concentration and impact can be an index of how seriously a nation considers a health problem, the low visibility of Australian research examining Indigenous health does not demonstrate a level of concern commensurate with the gravity of Indigenous health problems. Further investigation for the reasons for lower citations may identify potential intervention strategies.

摘要

目的

与七个选定的健康领域相比,确定 1972 年至 2008 年间澳大利亚原住民健康研究文献的增长模式和引用量。

方法

利用 Web of Science 确定了 1972 年至 2008 年间所有由澳大利亚研究人员撰写的关于澳大利亚原住民健康的出版物(n=820)。还捕获了每个出版物的引用量。与选定的健康领域以及澳大利亚所有研究出版物相比,研究出版物的增长情况进行了比较。

结果

尽管研究出版物的数量相对较少,但研究出版物的增长率为 14.1%,而澳大利亚所有研究领域的增长率为 8.2%。在我们的七个健康和医学研究类别中,这一增长率排名第二。然而,原住民出版物的引用量明显低于澳大利亚的平均水平。

结论

虽然有关原住民健康的研究出版物呈积极增长,但通过引用对此类研究的关注仍然低得令人失望。

意义

鉴于研究集中程度和影响力可以作为一个国家如何认真对待健康问题的指标,澳大利亚研究人员对原住民健康问题的关注度较低,这表明对这一问题的关注程度与原住民健康问题的严重性不相称。进一步调查引用量较低的原因可能会确定潜在的干预策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验