The Cairns Institute and School of Education, James Cook University, McGregor Rd, Smithfield 4878, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 3;12:600. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-600.
The transfer and implementation of acceptable and effective health services, programs and innovations across settings provides an important and potentially cost-effective strategy for reducing Indigenous Australians' high burden of disease. This study reports a systematic review of Indigenous health services, programs and innovations to examine the extent to which studies considered processes of transfer and implementation within and across Indigenous communities and healthcare settings.
Medline, Informit, Infotrac, Blackwells Publishing, Proquest, Taylor and Francis, JStor, and the Indigenous HealthInfoNet were searched using terms: Aborigin* OR Indigen* OR Torres AND health AND service OR program* OR intervention AND Australia to locate publications from 1992-2011. The reference lists of 19 reviews were also checked. Data from peer reviewed journals, reports, and websites were included. The 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for proportions that referred to and focussed on transfer were calculated as exact binomial confidence intervals. Test comparisons between proportions were calculated using Fisher's exact test with an alpha level of 5%.
Of 1311 publications identified, 119 (9.1%; 95% CI: 7.6%-10.8%) referred to the transfer and implementation of Indigenous Australian health services or programs, but only 21 studies (1.6%; 95% CI: 1.0%-2.4%) actually focused on transfer and implementation. Of the 119 transfer studies, 37 (31.1%; 95% CI: 22.9-40.2%) evaluated the impact of a service or program, 28 (23.5%; 95% CI: 16.2%-32.2%) reported only process measures and 54 were descriptive. Of the 37 impact evaluation studies, 28 (75.7%; 95% CI: 58.8%-88.2%) appeared in peer reviewed journals but none included experimental designs.
While services and programs are being transferred and implemented, few studies focus on the process by which this occurred or the effectiveness of the service or program in the new setting. Findings highlight a need for partnerships between researchers and health services to evaluate the transfer and implementation of Indigenous health services and programs using rigorous designs, and publish such efforts in peer-reviewed journals as a quality assurance mechanism.
在不同环境中转移和实施可接受且有效的卫生服务、计划和创新,为降低澳大利亚原住民的高疾病负担提供了一个重要且具有潜在成本效益的策略。本研究系统综述了原住民卫生服务、计划和创新,以考察研究在多大程度上考虑了在原住民社区和医疗保健环境内部和之间的转移和实施过程。
使用术语“原住民*”或“土著*”或“托雷斯海峡岛民”和“健康”和“服务或计划或干预”和“澳大利亚”在 Medline、Informit、Infotrac、Blackwells Publishing、Proquest、Taylor and Francis、JStor 和 Indigenous HealthInfoNet 中搜索,以定位 1992 年至 2011 年的出版物。还检查了 19 项审查的参考文献列表。包括同行评议期刊、报告和网站的数据。计算了提到并专注于转移的比例的 95%置信区间(95%CI),作为精确二项置信区间。使用 Fisher 精确检验(alpha 水平为 5%)计算比例之间的检验比较。
在确定的 1311 项出版物中,有 119 项(9.1%;95%CI:7.6%-10.8%)提到了澳大利亚原住民卫生服务或计划的转移和实施,但只有 21 项研究(1.6%;95%CI:1.0%-2.4%)真正关注转移和实施。在 119 项转移研究中,37 项(31.1%;95%CI:22.9-40.2%)评估了服务或计划的影响,28 项(23.5%;95%CI:16.2%-32.2%)仅报告了过程措施,54 项为描述性研究。在 37 项影响评估研究中,28 项(75.7%;95%CI:58.8%-88.2%)发表在同行评议期刊上,但没有一项研究包括实验设计。
虽然正在转移和实施服务和计划,但很少有研究关注发生这种情况的过程或新环境中服务或计划的有效性。研究结果强调了研究人员和卫生服务部门之间需要建立伙伴关系,以使用严格的设计来评估原住民卫生服务和计划的转移和实施,并在同行评议期刊上发表这些工作,作为质量保证机制。