Suppr超能文献

刷牙运动后手动牙刷的功效:系统评价。

The efficacy of manual toothbrushes following a brushing exercise: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Dent Hyg. 2012 Aug;10(3):187-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00557.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

Abstract

AIM

To determine the efficacy of manual tooth brushing with respect to toothbrush design and brushing duration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The PubMed-MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through October 2010 to identify appropriate studies. The outcome measurement was dental plaque removal following subject brushing.

RESULTS

The search yielded 2119 titles and abstracts. Ultimately, 59 papers with 212 brushing exercises as separate legs of the experiments and meeting the eligibility criteria were selected. Overall, a brushing exercise provides a 42% (21) plaque score reduction (95% CI: 41.23; 42.03). Of the brushing studies providing data as assessed according to the Quigley and Hein plaque index, the weighted mean reduction from baseline in plaque scores was 30% (95% CI: 26.79; 33.21). A weighted mean plaque score reduction of 53% (95% CI: 49.51; 56.49) was observed in the experiments using the Navy plaque index. Subanalysis between the different bristle tuft configurations illustrated variation in plaque removal ability (24-61%). The angled bristle design numerically showed the highest mean plaque reduction with either index. A subanalysis of brushing duration revealed after 1 min, a mean reduction of 27% and after 2 min, 41%.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy in plaque removal following a brushing exercise is a reduction from baseline plaque scores of 42% on average, with a variation of 30-53% dependent on the plaque index used. The available evidence indicates that bristle tuft arrangement (flat trim, multilevel, angled) and brushing duration are factors that contribute to the variation in observed efficacy.

摘要

目的

确定手动刷牙在牙刷设计和刷牙时间方面的效果。

材料和方法

通过 2010 年 10 月的 PubMed-MEDLINE 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 搜索,以确定合适的研究。结果测量为受试者刷牙后牙菌斑的清除情况。

结果

搜索产生了 2119 个标题和摘要。最终,有 59 篇论文和 212 次刷牙实验作为实验的单独部分,符合入选标准。总体而言,刷牙运动可使菌斑减少 42%(21)(95%CI:41.23;42.03)。在根据 Quigley 和 Hein 菌斑指数提供数据的刷牙研究中,基线时菌斑评分的加权平均降低率为 30%(95%CI:26.79;33.21)。使用海军菌斑指数的实验中,观察到菌斑评分的加权平均降低率为 53%(95%CI:49.51;56.49)。不同刷毛束配置之间的亚分析表明了清除菌斑能力的差异(24-61%)。在使用指数时,角度刷毛设计在数值上显示出最高的平均菌斑减少率。刷牙时间的亚分析表明,1 分钟后平均降低 27%,2 分钟后降低 41%。

结论

刷牙运动后牙菌斑的清除效果平均为基线牙菌斑评分降低 42%,使用的菌斑指数不同,降低率在 30-53%之间。现有证据表明,刷毛束排列(平切、多层、倾斜)和刷牙时间是导致观察到的效果差异的因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验