Shimada Yuichi J, Ishikawa Kiyotake, Kawase Yoshiaki, Ladage Dennis, Tilemann Lisa, Shiota Takahiro, Hajjar Roger J
Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Medical Center, University Hospital and Manhattan Campus for the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York 10003, USA.
Echocardiography. 2012 Oct;29(9):1091-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2012.01753.x. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
Accurate left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV) measurement is clinically important in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) is expected to overcome limitations of two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE). However, inaccuracy in volumetry by 3DE has often been reported hindering further clinical application. This study aimed at comparing agreement and correlation with the thermodilution method (TDM) between 2DE and 3DE measurement of LVSV.
Swine model of myocardial infarction was created and LVSV was measured by 3DE by subtracting end-systolic from end-diastolic volume (3DE-method). Pulsed Doppler ultrasound and left ventricular outlet tract area were used to measure LVSV by 2DE (2DE-method). TDM was performed by the Swan-Ganz catheter. Bland-Altman analysis followed by assessment of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were performed between 2DE-method and TDM as well as 3DE-method and TDM.
A total of 25 comparisons revealed a significant overestimation of LVSV by the 2DE-method (bias = 6.5 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9-9.0 mL; P < 0.0001), whereas there was no significant bias by the 3DE-method (bias =-1.6; 95% CI, -4.3 to 1.1 mL; P = 0.22). The ICC between 2DE and TDM was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.14-0.74) whereas ICC between 3DE and TDM was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.51-0.88).
This study elucidated that LVSV is better estimated by 3DE-method compared to the conventional 2DE-method. This investigation will provide a more accurate, quick and noninvasive way of LVSV and cardiac output assessment at bedside by further application of 3DE.
准确测量左心室每搏输出量(LVSV)对于急性心肌梗死患者具有重要的临床意义。三维超声心动图(3DE)有望克服二维超声心动图(2DE)的局限性。然而,经常有报道称3DE容积测量不准确,这阻碍了其进一步的临床应用。本研究旨在比较2DE和3DE测量LVSV与热稀释法(TDM)之间的一致性和相关性。
建立猪心肌梗死模型,通过3DE测量舒张末期容积减去收缩末期容积来测量LVSV(3DE法)。使用脉冲多普勒超声和左心室流出道面积通过2DE测量LVSV(2DE法)。通过Swan-Ganz导管进行TDM。对2DE法与TDM以及3DE法与TDM进行Bland-Altman分析,随后评估组内相关系数(ICC)。
总共25次比较显示,2DE法显著高估了LVSV(偏差 = 6.5 mL;95%置信区间[CI],3.9 - 9.0 mL;P < 0.0001),而3DE法无显著偏差(偏差 = -1.6;95% CI,-4.3至1.1 mL;P = 0.22)。2DE与TDM之间的ICC为0.49(95% CI,0.14 - 0.74),而3DE与TDM之间的ICC为0.75(95% CI,0.51 - 0.88)。
本研究表明,与传统的2DE法相比,3DE法能更好地估计LVSV。通过进一步应用3DE,本研究将为床旁LVSV和心输出量评估提供一种更准确、快速且无创的方法。