Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2012 Oct-Dec;27(4):308-26. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2113. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
This paper examines the implementation of Thailand's universal coverage healthcare reforms in a rural province, using data from field studies undertaken in 2003-2005 and 2008-2011. We focus on the strand of policy that aimed to develop primary care by allocating funds to contracting units for primary care (CUPs) responsible for managing local service networks. The two studies document a striking change in the balance of power in the local healthcare system over the 8-year period. Initially, the newly formed CUPs gained influence as 'power followed the money', and the provincial health offices (PHOs), which had commanded the service units, were left with a weaker co-ordination role. However, the situation changed as a new insurance purchaser, the National Health Security Office, took financial control and established regional outposts. National Health Security Office outposts worked with PHOs to develop rationalised management tools-strategic plans, targets, KPIs and benchmarking-that installed the PHOs as performance managers of local healthcare systems. New lines of accountability and changed budgetary systems reduced the power of the CUPs to control resource allocation and patterns of services within CUP networks. Whereas some CUPs fought to retain limited autonomy, the PHO has been able to regain much of its former control. We suggest that implementation theory needs to take a long view to capture the complexity of a major reform initiative and argue for an analysis that recognises the key role of policy networks and advocacy coalitions that span national and local levels and realign over time.
本文考察了泰国在一个农村省份实施全民医疗保险改革的情况,所使用的数据来自于 2003-2005 年和 2008-2011 年进行的实地研究。我们重点关注旨在通过向负责管理当地服务网络的基层医疗承包单位(CUP)分配资金来发展基层医疗的政策措施。这两项研究记录了在 8 年期间,当地医疗体系权力平衡发生的显著变化。最初,新成立的 CUP 由于“资金决定权力”而获得了影响力,而曾经指挥服务单位的省级卫生办公室(PHO)则只剩下一个较弱的协调角色。然而,随着新的保险购买者——国家健康保障办公室(National Health Security Office)接管财务控制权并建立区域前哨,情况发生了变化。国家健康保障办公室前哨与 PHO 合作制定了合理化的管理工具——战略计划、目标、KPI 和基准——这些工具将 PHO 作为地方医疗系统的绩效管理机构。新的问责线和改变的预算系统削弱了 CUP 控制 CUP 网络内资源分配和服务模式的权力。尽管一些 CUP 努力保留有限的自主权,但 PHO 已经能够重新获得其大部分前权力。我们认为,实施理论需要从长远角度来捕捉重大改革计划的复杂性,并主张进行分析,以认识到跨越国家和地方层面并随时间重新调整的政策网络和倡导联盟的关键作用。