Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands.
BMJ. 2012 Jun 6;344:e2985. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2985.
To determine whether the use of age adapted D-dimer cut-off values can be translated to primary care patients who are suspected of deep vein thrombosis.
Retrospective, cross sectional diagnostic study.
110 primary care doctors affiliated with three hospitals in the Netherlands.
1374 consecutive patients (936 (68.1%) aged >50 years) with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis.
Proportion of patients with D-dimer values below two proposed age adapted cut-off levels (age in years × 10 μg/L in patients aged >50 years, or 750 μg/L in patients aged ≥ 60 years), in whom deep vein thrombosis could be excluded; and the number of false negative results.
Using the Wells score, 647 patients had an unlikely clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis. In these patients (at all ages), deep vein thrombosis could be excluded in 309 (47.8%) using the age dependent cut-off value compared with 272 (42.0%) using the conventional cut-off value of 500 μg/L (increase 5.7%, 95% confidence interval 4.1% to 7.8%). This exclusion rate resulted in 0.5% and 0.3% false negative cases, respectively (increase 0.2%, 0.004% to 8.6%).The increase in exclusion rate by using the age dependent cut-off value was highest in the oldest patients. In patients older than 80 years, deep vein thrombosis could be safely excluded in 22 (35.5%) patients using the age dependent cut-off value compared with 13 (21.0%) using the conventional cut-off value (increase 14.5%, 6.8% to 25.8%). Compared with the age dependent cut-off value, the cut-off value of 750 μg/L had a similar exclusion rate (307 (47.4%) patients) and false negative rate (0.3%).
Combined with a low clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis, use of the age dependent D-dimer cut-off value for patients older than 50 years or the cut-off value of 750 μg/L for patients aged 60 years and older resulted in a considerable increase in the proportion of patients in primary care in whom deep vein thrombosis could be safely excluded, compared with the conventional cut-off value of 500 μg/L.
确定年龄适应的 D-二聚体截断值是否可应用于疑似深静脉血栓形成的初级保健患者。
回顾性、横断面诊断研究。
荷兰 3 家医院的 110 名初级保健医生。
1374 例连续疑似深静脉血栓形成的患者(936 例(68.1%)年龄>50 岁)。
D-二聚体值低于两个建议的年龄适应截断值(年龄×10μg/L 患者年龄>50 岁,或患者年龄≥60 岁时 750μg/L)的患者比例,深静脉血栓形成可排除;以及假阴性结果的数量。
根据 Wells 评分,647 例患者的深静脉血栓形成临床可能性较低。在这些患者(所有年龄)中,与使用 500μg/L 的传统截断值相比,使用年龄依赖性截断值可排除 309 例(47.8%)深静脉血栓形成,而使用年龄依赖性截断值可排除 272 例(42.0%)(增加 5.7%,95%置信区间 4.1%至 7.8%)。这种排除率导致假阴性病例分别为 0.5%和 0.3%(增加 0.2%,0.004%至 8.6%)。使用年龄依赖性截断值的排除率增加在最年长的患者中最高。在年龄>80 岁的患者中,与使用传统截断值相比,使用年龄依赖性截断值可安全排除 22 例(35.5%)深静脉血栓形成,而使用传统截断值可排除 13 例(21.0%)(增加 14.5%,6.8%至 25.8%)。与年龄依赖性截断值相比,750μg/L 的截断值具有相似的排除率(307 例(47.4%)患者)和假阴性率(0.3%)。
结合深静脉血栓形成的低临床可能性,如果患者年龄>50 岁,使用年龄依赖性 D-二聚体截断值,或患者年龄≥60 岁,使用 750μg/L 的截断值,与使用 500μg/L 的传统截断值相比,初级保健中可安全排除深静脉血栓形成的患者比例显著增加。