Hopper Kate, Epstein Steven E, Fletcher Daniel J, Boller Manuel
School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2012 Jun;22 Suppl 1:S26-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2012.00753.x.
To systematically examine the evidence on basic life support (BLS) in veterinary CPR and to determine knowledge gaps.
Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence and quality, and development of consensus on conclusions for application of the concepts to clinical practice. Relevant questions were answered on a worksheet template and reviewed by the Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) BLS domain members, by the RECOVER committee and opened for comments by veterinary professionals for 30 days.
Academia, referral practice, and general practice.
Sixteen worksheets were prepared to evaluate techniques for chest compression and ventilation strategies as well as identification of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). Major recommendations arising from this evidence review include performing chest compressions at a rate of at least 100/min at a compression depth of one-third to half the width of the chest with minimal pauses, and early instigation of ventilation at a rate of 8-10 breaths/min in intubated patients, or using a 30:2 compression/ventilation ratio in nonintubated patients.
Although veterinary clinical trials are lacking, much of the experimental literature on BLS utilized canine models. The major conclusions from this analysis of the literature are the importance of early identification of CPA, and immediate initiation of BLS in these patients. Many knowledge gaps exist, most importantly in our understanding of the optimal hand placement and technique for chest compressions, warranting coordinated future studies targeted at questions of relevance to differences between veterinary species and humans.
系统审查兽医心肺复苏术中基础生命支持(BLS)的证据,并确定知识空白。
对文献进行标准化、系统评价,根据证据水平和质量对相关文章进行分类,并就将这些概念应用于临床实践的结论达成共识。相关问题在工作表模板上作答,并由兽医复苏重新评估运动(RECOVER)BLS领域成员、RECOVER委员会进行审查,并向兽医专业人员开放评论30天。
学术界、转诊实践和一般实践。
准备了16份工作表,以评估胸外按压技术、通气策略以及心肺骤停(CPA)的识别。本次证据审查得出的主要建议包括:以至少每分钟100次的速率进行胸外按压,按压深度为胸部宽度的三分之一至一半,尽量减少停顿;对于插管患者,以每分钟8 - 10次呼吸的速率尽早开始通气,对于未插管患者,采用30:2的按压/通气比率。
尽管缺乏兽医临床试验,但关于BLS的许多实验文献使用了犬类模型。对文献分析得出的主要结论是早期识别CPA以及对这些患者立即启动BLS的重要性。存在许多知识空白,最重要的是我们对胸外按压的最佳手部位置和技术的理解,这需要未来针对与兽医物种和人类差异相关问题进行协调研究。