Suppr超能文献

药物干预治疗化脓性汗腺炎:证据说了什么?

Pharmacologic interventions for hidradenitis suppurativa: what does the evidence say?

机构信息

Division of Dermatology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Clin Dermatol. 2012 Oct 1;13(5):283-91. doi: 10.2165/11631880-000000000-00000.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic debilitating skin disease that is recalcitrant to treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article was to conduct an evidence-based review of pharmacologic interventions for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database was conducted to identify controlled trials (randomized controlled trials, cohorts, and case-control studies) published in English. The abstracts were examined using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The identified studies were used to develop the recommendations. Clinically relevant outcomes that were assessed were: clinical remission, patient global assessment, physician global assessment, number of skin lesions, and improvement in Hurley's stage, or Sartorius score.

RESULTS

Overall there was sparse evidence to support the use of any treatment modality. There is fair evidence to support the use of antibacterials in HS and they should be used as first-line therapy (level II-1/grade B). There is fair evidence to support the use of intravenous infliximab in the treatment of advanced HS (Hurley's stage II and III). Given the high cost of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and its adverse-effect profile, intravenous infliximab should be offered to patients with severe disease affecting their daily activities who have failed antibacterial therapy (level I/grade B). There is insufficient evidence to support the use of antiandrogens in HS; consideration could be given to their use in women with mild to moderate disease (Hurley's stage I and II) who have failed antibacterial therapy and women with an abnormal hormone profile (level II-2/grade I).

CONCLUSIONS

The existing evidence suggests that antibacterials and anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy are effective in the treatment of HS. Further research is required to confirm the efficacy of the different medications within these groups and to explore the efficacy of other treatment modalities.

摘要

背景

化脓性汗腺炎是一种慢性衰弱性皮肤病,治疗效果不佳。

目的

本文旨在对化脓性汗腺炎(HS)的药物治疗进行循证综述。

方法

对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库进行系统检索,以识别发表在英文期刊上的对照试验(随机对照试验、队列研究和病例对照研究)。使用预定的纳入和排除标准检查摘要。所确定的研究被用于制定建议。评估的临床相关结局包括:临床缓解、患者总体评估、医生总体评估、皮损数量以及 Hurley 分期或 Sartorius 评分的改善。

结果

总体而言,支持任何治疗方式的证据很少。有一定证据支持抗菌药物在 HS 中的应用,应将其作为一线治疗(II-1/级 B)。静脉注射英夫利昔单抗治疗晚期 HS(Hurley 分期 II 和 III)有一定证据支持。鉴于抗 TNF 治疗的高成本及其不良反应谱,对于严重影响日常生活且抗菌治疗失败的患者,应提供静脉注射英夫利昔单抗(I/级 B)。抗雄激素在 HS 中的应用证据不足;对于抗菌治疗失败且激素水平异常的轻中度疾病(Hurley 分期 I 和 II)女性,可考虑使用抗雄激素(II-2/级 I)。

结论

现有证据表明,抗菌药物和抗 TNF 治疗对 HS 有效。需要进一步研究以确认这些药物在这些药物中的疗效,并探讨其他治疗方式的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验