Suppr超能文献

新质量规定与既定养老院惯例:一项定性研究。

New quality regulations versus established nursing home practice: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Studies, Sogn og Fjordane University College, Førde, Norway.

Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2012 Jun 7;11:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-11-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Western governments have initiated reforms to improve the quality of care for nursing home residents. Most of these reforms encompass the use of regulations and national quality indicators. In the Norwegian context, these regulations comprise two pages of text that are easy to read and understand. They focus particularly on residents' rights to plan their day-to-day life in nursing homes. However, the research literature indicates that the implementation of the new regulations, particularly if they aim to change nursing practice, is extremely challenging. The aim of this study was to further explore and describe nursing practice to gain a deeper understanding of why it is so hard to implement the new regulations.

METHODS

For this qualitative study, an ethnographic design was chosen to explore and describe nursing practice. Fieldwork was conducted in two nursing homes. In total, 45 nurses and nursing aides were included in participant observation, and 10 were interviewed at the end of the field study.

RESULTS

Findings indicate that the staff knew little about the new quality regulations, and that the quality of their work was guided by other factors rooted in their nursing practice. Further analyses revealed that the staff appeared to be committed to daily routines and also that they always seemed to know what to do. Having routines and always knowing what to do mutually strengthen and enhance each other, and together they form a powerful force that makes daily nursing care a taken-for-granted activity.

CONCLUSION

New regulations are challenging to implement because nursing practices are so strongly embedded. Improving practice requires systematic and deeply rooted practical change in everyday action and thinking.

摘要

背景

西方国家政府已经启动改革,以提高养老院居民的护理质量。这些改革大多涵盖了法规和国家质量指标的使用。在挪威的背景下,这些法规包含两页易于阅读和理解的文本。它们特别侧重于居民在养老院规划日常生活的权利。然而,研究文献表明,新法规的实施,特别是如果这些法规旨在改变护理实践,极具挑战性。本研究的目的是进一步探索和描述护理实践,以更深入地了解为什么实施新法规如此困难。

方法

为了进行这项定性研究,选择了民族志设计来探索和描述护理实践。在两个养老院进行了实地工作。共有 45 名护士和护理助理参与了参与者观察,10 人在实地研究结束时接受了访谈。

结果

研究结果表明,工作人员对新的质量法规知之甚少,他们的工作质量受到植根于护理实践的其他因素的指导。进一步的分析表明,工作人员似乎致力于日常工作,而且他们似乎总是知道该做什么。日常工作和总是知道该做什么相互加强和增强彼此,共同形成了一种强大的力量,使日常护理成为一种理所当然的活动。

结论

新法规的实施具有挑战性,因为护理实践已经如此根深蒂固。要改进实践,需要在日常行动和思维中进行系统和深入的实际变革。

相似文献

4
5

本文引用的文献

5
Nurse strategies for optimising patient participation in nursing care.护士优化患者参与护理的策略。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Sep;23(3):490-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00649.x. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
6
Conditions for successfully implementing resident-oriented care in nursing homes.养老院成功实施以居民为导向的护理的条件。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Jun;23(2):298-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00623.x. Epub 2009 Mar 8.
8
Good work - how is it recognised by the nurse?做得不错——护士是如何认可的呢?
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jun;17(12):1645-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02139.x.
10
A concept analysis of routine: relevance to nursing.常规的概念分析:与护理的相关性
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Feb;57(4):442-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04103.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验