Center for Child and Family Policy and the Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;53(10):1009-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02565.x. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
Children growing up in poor versus affluent neighborhoods are more likely to spend time in prison, develop health problems and die at an early age. The question of how neighborhood conditions influence our behavior and health has attracted the attention of public health officials and scholars for generations. Online tools are now providing new opportunities to measure neighborhood features and may provide a cost effective way to advance our understanding of neighborhood effects on child health.
A virtual systematic social observation (SSO) study was conducted to test whether Google Street View could be used to reliably capture the neighborhood conditions of families participating in the Environmental-Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study. Multiple raters coded a subsample of 120 neighborhoods and convergent and discriminant validity was evaluated on the full sample of over 1,000 neighborhoods by linking virtual SSO measures to: (a) consumer based geo-demographic classifications of deprivation and health, (b) local resident surveys of disorder and safety, and (c) parent and teacher assessments of children's antisocial behavior, prosocial behavior, and body mass index.
High levels of observed agreement were documented for signs of physical disorder, physical decay, dangerousness and street safety. Inter-rater agreement estimates fell within the moderate to substantial range for all of the scales (ICCs ranged from .48 to .91). Negative neighborhood features, including SSO-rated disorder and decay and dangerousness corresponded with local resident reports, demonstrated a graded relationship with census-defined indices of socioeconomic status, and predicted higher levels of antisocial behavior among local children. In addition, positive neighborhood features, including SSO-rated street safety and the percentage of green space, were associated with higher prosocial behavior and healthy weight status among children.
Our results support the use of Google Street View as a reliable and cost effective tool for measuring both negative and positive features of local neighborhoods.
在贫困和富裕社区长大的孩子更有可能入狱、出现健康问题和早逝。几十年来,社区环境如何影响我们的行为和健康一直是公共卫生官员和学者关注的问题。如今,在线工具为衡量社区特征提供了新的机会,也为增进我们对社区对儿童健康影响的理解提供了一种具有成本效益的方法。
进行了一项虚拟的系统社会观察(SSO)研究,以检验谷歌街景(Google Street View)是否可用于可靠地捕捉参与环境风险(E-Risk)纵向双胞胎研究的家庭的邻里条件。多名评分者对 120 个邻里进行了抽样评分,并通过将虚拟 SSO 测量值与以下各项联系起来,评估了 1000 多个邻里的全样本的收敛和判别效度:(a)基于消费者的地理人口剥夺和健康分类;(b)对无序和安全的当地居民调查;以及(c)父母和教师对儿童反社会行为、亲社会行为和体重指数的评估。
观察到的物理无序、物理衰败、危险和街道安全等方面的指标有很高的一致性。所有量表的组内相关系数(ICC)均在中等至较大范围(ICC 范围为.48 至.91),表明评分者之间的一致性估计较高。负面的邻里特征,包括 SSO 评定的无序和衰败以及危险程度,与当地居民报告的情况相符,与按人口普查定义的社会经济地位指数呈梯度关系,并预测当地儿童的反社会行为水平较高。此外,积极的邻里特征,包括 SSO 评定的街道安全和绿地百分比,与儿童的亲社会行为和健康体重状况相关。
我们的研究结果支持使用谷歌街景(Google Street View)作为一种可靠且具有成本效益的工具,用于衡量当地社区的负面和正面特征。