一项关于混合阿拉伯胶纤维、车前子纤维和果糖与聚乙二醇 3350 加电解质治疗儿童慢性功能性便秘的随机、前瞻性、对照研究。

A randomized, prospective, comparison study of a mixture of acacia fiber, psyllium fiber, and fructose vs polyethylene glycol 3350 with electrolytes for the treatment of chronic functional constipation in childhood.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University "Federico II," Naples, Italy.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2012 Oct;161(4):710-5.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.04.043. Epub 2012 Jun 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of a mixture of acacia fiber, psyllium fiber, and fructose (AFPFF) with polyethylene glycol 3350 combined with electrolytes (PEG+E) in the treatment of children with chronic functional constipation (CFC); and to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of AFPFF in the treatment of children with CFC.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized, open label, prospective, controlled, parallel-group study involving 100 children (M/F: 38/62; mean age ± SD: 6.5 ± 2.7 years) who were diagnosed with CFC according to the Rome III Criteria. Children were randomly divided into 2 groups: 50 children received AFPFF (16.8 g daily) and 50 children received PEG+E (0.5 g/kg daily) for 8 weeks. Primary outcome measures were frequency of bowel movements, stool consistency, fecal incontinence, and improvement of other associated gastrointestinal symptoms. Safety was assessed with evaluation of clinical adverse effects and growth measurements.

RESULTS

Compliance rates were 72% for AFPFF and 96% for PEG+E. A significant improvement of constipation was seen in both groups. After 8 weeks, 77.8% of children treated with AFPFF and 83% of children treated with PEG+E had improved (P = .788). Neither PEG+E nor AFPFF caused any clinically significant side effects during the entire course of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized study, we did not find any significant difference between the efficacy of AFPFF and PEG+E in the treatment of children with CFC. Both medications were proved to be safe for CFC treatment, but PEG+E was better accepted by children.

摘要

目的

比较聚乙二醇 3350 联合电解质(PEG+E)与阿拉伯胶纤维、车前子纤维和果糖混合物(AFPFF)治疗儿童慢性功能性便秘(CFC)的疗效,并评估 AFPFF 治疗 CFC 儿童的安全性和有效性。

研究设计

这是一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性、对照、平行组研究,纳入了 100 名符合 Rome III 标准诊断为 CFC 的儿童(男/女:38/62;平均年龄±标准差:6.5±2.7 岁)。儿童被随机分为 2 组:50 名儿童接受 AFPFF(每日 16.8g),50 名儿童接受 PEG+E(每日 0.5g/kg),疗程均为 8 周。主要结局指标为排便频率、粪便稠度、粪便失禁以及其他相关胃肠道症状的改善。安全性通过评估临床不良事件和生长测量来评估。

结果

AFPFF 的依从率为 72%,PEG+E 的依从率为 96%。两组患儿便秘均有明显改善。治疗 8 周后,AFPFF 治疗组 77.8%的儿童和 PEG+E 治疗组 83%的儿童症状改善(P=.788)。在整个研究期间,PEG+E 和 AFPFF 均未引起任何临床显著的不良反应。

结论

在这项随机研究中,我们未发现 AFPFF 和 PEG+E 治疗 CFC 儿童的疗效有显著差异。这两种药物均被证明对 CFC 治疗安全,但 PEG+E 更受儿童接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索