A comparative study on endoscopy treatment in rectal carcinoid tumors.

BACKGROUND

To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of various endoscopic resection methods for rectal carcinoid tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 3 types of endoscopic resection techniques for rectal carcinoid tumors was performed. The surgical time and the complication rate were compared between 30 patients who underwent conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-C), or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). All rectal carcinoid tumors were under 1 cm and were treated in our center between January 2002 and January 2008.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent each surgical approach. All cases were pathologically diagnosed as rectal carcinoid tumors. One-time complete resection rates using the conventional EMR, EMR-C, and ESD were 80%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. The operation time ranged from 5 to 53 minutes for the conventional EMR group, from 4 to 7 minutes for the EMR-C group, and from 16 to 35 minutes for the ESD group. The average follow-up time for the 30 patients was 18.43 ± 9.76 months. There were no recurrent or metastatic cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic resection for rectal carcinoid tumors below 1 cm was safe. Considering the clinical efficacy, surgical time, and intraoperative complication rate, EMR-C may be the best endoscopic excision method.