Suppr超能文献

饮食模式与口腔癌风险——因素分析研究。

Dietary pattern and oral cancer risk--a factor analysis study.

机构信息

Oral Cancer Research & Coordinating Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;40(6):560-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00704.x. Epub 2012 Jun 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The role of diet in cancer risk has mainly been investigated based on intake of individual food items. However, food consumption is made up of a combination of various food items. This study aims to determine the association of dietary patterns with oral cancer risk.

METHODS

A total of 306 matched cases and controls were recruited in this study. Data on dietary intake were obtained using food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Factor analysis (FA) was performed to identify dietary patterns based on the intake of nine major food groups, resulting in four factors/components being retained. The odds ratio (OR) was computed for each component using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

The first pattern labelled as 'modern' was loaded with processed foods and snacks, whereas the second pattern termed as 'prudent' was characterized by intake of fruits and vegetables. The third pattern labelled as 'traditional' consisted of beverages and starches, while the fourth pattern termed as 'combination' was loaded with intakes of dairy, fermented/salted and meat/by-products. A significant reduced risk was found for 'prudent' (OR 0.53, 95% CI = 0.28-0.98), whereas an increased risk was found for both 'combination' (OR 2.43, 95% CI = 1.33-4.45) and 'traditional' (OR 2.32, 95% CI = 1.23-4.25) patterns. However, after adjusting for risk habits of tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and betel quid chewing, only 'combination' (aOR 2.99, 95% CI = 1.55-5.75) and 'traditional' (aOR 2.08, 95% CI = 1.09-3.97) patterns remained significant.

CONCLUSION

Consumption in the highest tertile of 'traditional' and 'combination' patterns may induce twice and thrice the risk of oral cancer, respectively.

摘要

目的

饮食在癌症风险中的作用主要是基于对单个食物摄入的研究。然而,食物的摄入是由各种食物的组合构成的。本研究旨在确定饮食模式与口腔癌风险之间的关联。

方法

本研究共招募了 306 对匹配的病例和对照。通过食物频率问卷(FFQ)获取饮食摄入数据。采用因子分析(FA),根据九大类食物的摄入情况,确定饮食模式,保留四个因子/成分。使用条件逻辑回归计算每个成分的比值比(OR)。

结果

第一个模式被标记为“现代”,主要包含加工食品和零食,而第二个模式被称为“谨慎”,特点是摄入水果和蔬菜。第三个模式被标记为“传统”,包含饮料和淀粉,而第四个模式被称为“组合”,富含奶制品、发酵/腌制和肉类/副产品。“谨慎”模式与口腔癌风险显著降低相关(OR 0.53,95%CI=0.28-0.98),而“组合”(OR 2.43,95%CI=1.33-4.45)和“传统”(OR 2.32,95%CI=1.23-4.25)模式与口腔癌风险增加相关。然而,调整烟草吸烟、饮酒和嚼槟榔等风险习惯后,仅“组合”(aOR 2.99,95%CI=1.55-5.75)和“传统”(aOR 2.08,95%CI=1.09-3.97)模式仍具有统计学意义。

结论

“传统”和“组合”模式摄入最高三分位可能分别使口腔癌风险增加两倍和三倍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验