Suppr超能文献

全科医生对预防保健检查的态度存在多样性和矛盾性——一项定性研究。

Diversity and ambivalence in general practitioners' attitudes towards preventive health checks - a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Section for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Jun 8;13:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-53.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematic preventive health checks in primary care have been introduced in several countries. The Danish Health Service does not provide this service, but health checks are nevertheless being conducted unsystematically. Very little is known about the GPs' experience with this service.The purpose of our study is to describe GPs' attitudes towards and concerns about providing preventive health checks and to describe their experiences with the health checks that they provide in daily practice.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted based on three semi-structured focus group interviews with 16 GPs from Central Region, Denmark. The focus group interviews took place at the Department of Public Health, Section for General Practice, Aarhus University in November 2010.

RESULTS

We found that the participating GPs all conducted some kind of preventive health checks, but also that there was great diversity in the content. The GPs were somewhat ambivalent towards health checks. Many GPs found the service beneficial for the patients. Concurrently, they had reservations about promoting ill-health, they questioned whether the health checks were a core mission of primary care, and they were concerned whether the health checks would benefit the "right" patients. The GPs felt a need for further documentation of the benefits for the patients before a possible future implementation of systematic health checks. Some GPs found that health checks could be performed in other settings than general practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that health checks are performed differently. Their quality differs, and the GPs perform the health check based on their personal attitude towards this service and prevention in general. Our analysis suggests that the doctors are basically uncertain about the best approach. Our study also uncovers the GPs' reservations about inducing negative psychological reactions and decreased well-being among the health check participants. Further studies are needed to disclose where these concerns emerge.

摘要

背景

系统的预防保健检查已在多个国家的初级保健中引入。丹麦的医疗服务并不提供这项服务,但健康检查仍在进行中,只是没有系统地进行。关于全科医生对此项服务的经验,我们知之甚少。我们研究的目的是描述全科医生对提供预防保健检查的态度和关注,并描述他们在日常实践中提供的健康检查的经验。

方法

这是一项基于丹麦中部地区 16 名全科医生的三次半结构化焦点小组访谈的定性描述性研究。焦点小组访谈于 2010 年 11 月在奥胡斯大学公共卫生系的普通科进行。

结果

我们发现,参与的全科医生都进行了某种形式的预防保健检查,但内容也存在很大的差异。全科医生对健康检查有些矛盾。许多全科医生认为这项服务对病人有益。同时,他们对促进健康状况不佳持保留态度,他们质疑健康检查是否是初级保健的核心任务,他们还担心健康检查是否会使“正确”的病人受益。全科医生认为,在可能未来实施系统健康检查之前,需要进一步记录对患者的益处。一些全科医生认为,健康检查可以在普通科以外的其他场所进行。

结论

我们的研究表明,健康检查的执行方式不同。它们的质量也不同,全科医生根据他们对这项服务和一般预防的个人态度来进行健康检查。我们的分析表明,医生基本上对最佳方法持不确定态度。我们的研究还揭示了全科医生对诱导健康检查参与者产生负面心理反应和降低幸福感的担忧。需要进一步的研究来揭示这些担忧的来源。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Enhancing rigor in qualitative description: a case study.加强定性描述的严谨性:一项案例研究。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2005 Nov-Dec;32(6):413-20. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200511000-00014.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验