Heart of Birmingham Teaching Primary Care Trust, Edgbaston, UK.
Health Place. 2012 Jul;18(4):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
The first cases of swine flu in the UK were detected on 27th April 2009. Two weeks later Birmingham became a "hotspot" for the HIN1 pandemic in England. This paper describes the experiences of local public health agencies during the pandemic and the problems encountered when trying to work within a hierarchical and hermetic system of national policy making. We argue that over reliance on the speculative logic of modellers, together with a failure to adapt swiftly the nation's preparedness plans and public health apparatus created in readiness for a serious and fatal disease, led to an institutional void of policy making during the pandemic, where new rules and concepts emerged about what constituted scientifically acceptable and politically legitimate interventions. The imposition of a single national approach to managing the pandemic and a disregard for the role of local authorities seriously impaired the ability of local agencies to respond in a flexible, timely and pragmatic way to the rapidly emerging situation. Future planning for pandemics must recognise that global epidemics are curbed at the local level, and ensure that any response is proportionate, flexible and effective.
英国首例猪流感病例于 2009 年 4 月 27 日确诊。两周后,伯明翰成为英格兰 HIN1 大流行的“热点”地区。本文描述了当地公共卫生机构在大流行期间的经验,以及在试图在国家决策的层级和封闭系统内工作时遇到的问题。我们认为,过度依赖建模者的推测逻辑,以及未能迅速调整为应对严重和致命疾病而制定的国家准备计划和公共卫生机构,导致大流行期间出现政策制定的制度空白,出现了关于什么构成科学上可接受和政治上合法干预的新规则和概念。对管理大流行采用单一的国家方法,以及无视地方当局的作用,严重削弱了地方机构以灵活、及时和务实的方式应对迅速出现的情况的能力。未来的大流行规划必须认识到,全球流行病是在地方层面得到控制的,并确保任何应对措施都是相称、灵活和有效的。