Suppr超能文献

在中国新冠疫情期间,国家体系比地方体系得到了更好的支持。

Better support for national than local system during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.

作者信息

Xie Xiaona, Zhang Yue, Zhang Robert Jiqi, Ding Yi, Guo Yongyu

机构信息

School of Psychology Nanjing Normal University Nanjing Jiangsu Province P.R. China.

出版信息

Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2022 Apr;22(1):183-197. doi: 10.1111/asap.12298. Epub 2022 Feb 11.

Abstract

Individuals increase their support for social systems in response to the threat, panic, and uncertainty that characterized the COVID-19 pandemic. This could be because a powerful social system can compensate for a lack of control at the individual level. However, the levels of public support for national versus local systems could be different in China. Two studies investigate whether people support the national more strongly than the local system during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study 1 analyzed data of 3593 participants from China; the results showed that participants reported higher levels of support for the national system than the local. In Study 2, we further tested a possible moderator for it. With a sample of 275 participants, we found that the difference between public support for national and local systems in China was based on the perceived higher response efficacy with the national government. Implications for research on system justification and governmental pandemic responses were discussed.

摘要

个体因新冠疫情所具有的威胁、恐慌和不确定性而增加了对社会制度的支持。这可能是因为一个强大的社会制度可以弥补个体层面上控制感的缺失。然而,在中国,公众对国家制度和地方制度的支持程度可能有所不同。两项研究调查了在新冠疫情期间人们对国家制度的支持是否比对地方制度的支持更强烈。研究1分析了来自中国的3593名参与者的数据;结果显示,参与者对国家制度的支持程度高于对地方制度的支持程度。在研究2中,我们进一步测试了一个可能的调节因素。以275名参与者为样本,我们发现中国公众对国家制度和地方制度支持的差异是基于对中央政府更高回应效能的认知。文中还讨论了对制度正当性研究和政府疫情应对措施的启示。

相似文献

1
Better support for national than local system during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.
Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2022 Apr;22(1):183-197. doi: 10.1111/asap.12298. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
6
Does COVID-19 threat increase xenophobia? The roles of protection efficacy and support seeking.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 11;22(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12912-8.
7
COVID-19 in China: Responses, Challenges and Implications for the Health System.
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jan 16;9(1):82. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010082.
9
The Homeless People in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Victims of the Strict Pandemic Control Measures of the Government.
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;9:679429. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.679429. eCollection 2021.
10
Panic, Psycho-Behavioral Responses, and Risk Perception in the Earliest Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 25;9:766842. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.766842. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Local response in health emergencies: key considerations for COVID-19 in informal urban settlements.
Environ Urban. 2020 Oct;32(2):503-522. doi: 10.1177/0956247820922843. Epub 2020 May 5.
2
Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):e0249596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249596. eCollection 2021.
3
The rise of COVID-19 cases is associated with support for world leaders.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 13;117(41):25429-25433. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009252117. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
4
Evidence of initial success for China exiting COVID-19 social distancing policy after achieving containment.
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Oct 1;5:81. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15843.2. eCollection 2020.
5
Psychological interventions for people affected by the COVID-19 epidemic.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):300-302. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30073-0. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
8
9
The Effects of General System Justification on Corruption Perception and Intent.
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 26;7:1107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01107. eCollection 2016.
10
Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world.
Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):694-722. doi: 10.1037/a0038703. Epub 2015 Feb 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验