• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中国新冠疫情期间,国家体系比地方体系得到了更好的支持。

Better support for national than local system during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.

作者信息

Xie Xiaona, Zhang Yue, Zhang Robert Jiqi, Ding Yi, Guo Yongyu

机构信息

School of Psychology Nanjing Normal University Nanjing Jiangsu Province P.R. China.

出版信息

Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2022 Apr;22(1):183-197. doi: 10.1111/asap.12298. Epub 2022 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1111/asap.12298
PMID:35602865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9111226/
Abstract

Individuals increase their support for social systems in response to the threat, panic, and uncertainty that characterized the COVID-19 pandemic. This could be because a powerful social system can compensate for a lack of control at the individual level. However, the levels of public support for national versus local systems could be different in China. Two studies investigate whether people support the national more strongly than the local system during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study 1 analyzed data of 3593 participants from China; the results showed that participants reported higher levels of support for the national system than the local. In Study 2, we further tested a possible moderator for it. With a sample of 275 participants, we found that the difference between public support for national and local systems in China was based on the perceived higher response efficacy with the national government. Implications for research on system justification and governmental pandemic responses were discussed.

摘要

个体因新冠疫情所具有的威胁、恐慌和不确定性而增加了对社会制度的支持。这可能是因为一个强大的社会制度可以弥补个体层面上控制感的缺失。然而,在中国,公众对国家制度和地方制度的支持程度可能有所不同。两项研究调查了在新冠疫情期间人们对国家制度的支持是否比对地方制度的支持更强烈。研究1分析了来自中国的3593名参与者的数据;结果显示,参与者对国家制度的支持程度高于对地方制度的支持程度。在研究2中,我们进一步测试了一个可能的调节因素。以275名参与者为样本,我们发现中国公众对国家制度和地方制度支持的差异是基于对中央政府更高回应效能的认知。文中还讨论了对制度正当性研究和政府疫情应对措施的启示。

相似文献

1
Better support for national than local system during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.在中国新冠疫情期间,国家体系比地方体系得到了更好的支持。
Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2022 Apr;22(1):183-197. doi: 10.1111/asap.12298. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
2
The psychological impact of threat and lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic: exacerbating factors and mitigating actions.COVID-19 大流行期间威胁和封锁的心理影响:加重因素和缓解措施。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):1318-1329. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab072.
3
The moderating influence of perceived government information transparency on COVID-19 pandemic information adoption on social media systems.感知到的政府信息透明度对社交媒体系统上新冠疫情信息采纳的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 19;14:1172094. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172094. eCollection 2023.
4
Association of Social Media Use With Mental Health Conditions of Nonpatients During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Insights from a National Survey Study.社交媒体使用与新冠疫情期间非患者心理健康状况的关联:一项全国性调查研究的启示。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 31;22(12):e23696. doi: 10.2196/23696.
5
The need for holistic, longitudinal and comparable, real-time assessment of the emotional, behavioral and societal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across nations.需要对新冠疫情在各国造成的情感、行为和社会影响进行全面、纵向、可比的实时评估。
Psychiatriki. 2021 Apr 19;32(1):15-18. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.010. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
Does COVID-19 threat increase xenophobia? The roles of protection efficacy and support seeking.新冠疫情是否会加剧仇外心理?保护效果和寻求支持的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 11;22(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12912-8.
7
COVID-19 in China: Responses, Challenges and Implications for the Health System.中国的新冠疫情:应对措施、挑战及对卫生系统的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jan 16;9(1):82. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010082.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
The Homeless People in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Victims of the Strict Pandemic Control Measures of the Government.中国新冠疫情期间的无家可归者:政府严格疫情防控措施的受害者。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;9:679429. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.679429. eCollection 2021.
10
Panic, Psycho-Behavioral Responses, and Risk Perception in the Earliest Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.中国新冠疫情最早期阶段的恐慌、心理行为反应及风险认知
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 25;9:766842. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.766842. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Local response in health emergencies: key considerations for COVID-19 in informal urban settlements.卫生紧急情况中的地方应对措施:城市非正式住区应对新冠疫情的关键考量因素
Environ Urban. 2020 Oct;32(2):503-522. doi: 10.1177/0956247820922843. Epub 2020 May 5.
2
Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 7;16(4):e0249596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249596. eCollection 2021.
3
The rise of COVID-19 cases is associated with support for world leaders.新冠病例的增加与对世界各国领导人的支持有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 13;117(41):25429-25433. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009252117. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
4
Evidence of initial success for China exiting COVID-19 social distancing policy after achieving containment.中国在实现疫情控制后退出新冠疫情社交距离政策初步取得成功的证据。
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Oct 1;5:81. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15843.2. eCollection 2020.
5
Psychological interventions for people affected by the COVID-19 epidemic.针对受新冠疫情影响人群的心理干预措施。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):300-302. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30073-0. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
Moderation analysis in two-instance repeated measures designs: Probing methods and multiple moderator models.两实例重复测量设计中的调节分析:探测方法和多个调节模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):61-82. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1088-6.
7
System justification: Experimental evidence, its contextual nature, and implications for social change.系统正当化:实验证据、其情境本质及其对社会变革的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Sep 19. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12278.
8
What inverted U can do for your country: A curvilinear relationship between confidence in the social system and political engagement.对国家而言,倒 U 曲线能做什么:社会制度信心与政治参与之间的曲线关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Nov;115(5):883-902. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000168. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
9
The Effects of General System Justification on Corruption Perception and Intent.一般系统正当性对腐败认知与意图的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 26;7:1107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01107. eCollection 2016.
10
Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world.补偿性控制与结构化世界的吸引力。
Psychol Bull. 2015 May;141(3):694-722. doi: 10.1037/a0038703. Epub 2015 Feb 16.