End-of Life Care Research Group, Ghent University and Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Sep;75(5):845-53. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.021. Epub 2012 May 17.
Since 2002, Belgium has had a national law legalising euthanasia. The law prescribes several substantive due care requirements and two procedural due care requirements, i.e. consultation with an independent physician and reporting of euthanasia to a Federal Control Committee. A large discrepancy in reporting rates between the Dutch-speaking (Flanders) and the French-speaking (Wallonia) parts of Belgium has led to speculation about cultural differences affecting the practice of euthanasia in both regions. Using Belgian data from the European Values Study conducted in 2008 among a representative sample of the general public and data from a large-scale mail questionnaire survey on euthanasia of 480 physicians from Flanders and 305 from Wallonia (conducted in 2009), this study presents empirical evidence of differences between both regions in attitudes towards and practice of euthanasia. Acceptance of euthanasia by the general population was found to be slightly higher in Flanders than in Wallonia. Compared with their Flemish counterparts, Walloon physicians held more negative attitudes towards performing euthanasia and towards the reporting obligation, less often labelled hypothetical cases correctly as euthanasia, and less often defined a case of euthanasia having to be reported. A higher proportion of Flemish physicians had received a euthanasia request since the introduction of the law. In cases of a euthanasia request, Walloon physicians consulted less often with an independent physician. Requests were more often granted in Flanders than in Wallonia (51% vs 38%), and performed euthanasia cases were more often reported (73% vs 58%). The study points out some significant differences between Flanders and Wallonia in practice, knowledge and attitudes regarding euthanasia and its legal requirements which are likely to explain the discrepancy between Wallonia and Flanders in the number of euthanasia cases reported. Cultural factors seem to play an important role in the practice of (legal) euthanasia and the extent to which legal safeguards are followed.
自 2002 年以来,比利时就有一项将安乐死合法化的全国性法律。该法律规定了几项实质性的谨慎护理要求和两项程序性谨慎护理要求,即与独立医生进行咨询以及向联邦控制委员会报告安乐死情况。比利时佛兰德斯(荷兰语区)和瓦隆大区(法语区)之间报告率的巨大差异导致人们猜测文化差异会影响这两个地区的安乐死实践。本研究利用 2008 年在普通公众中进行的欧洲价值观研究(EVST)中的比利时数据以及对来自佛兰德斯的 480 名医生和来自瓦隆大区的 305 名医生进行的大规模邮件问卷调查(于 2009 年进行)中的安乐死数据,为这两个地区在对安乐死的态度和实践方面的差异提供了实证证据。调查发现,佛兰德斯民众对安乐死的接受程度略高于瓦隆大区。与佛兰德斯的同行相比,瓦隆大区的医生对实施安乐死和报告义务持更消极的态度,较少将假设案例正确标记为安乐死,较少将必须报告的安乐死案例定义为报告案例。佛兰德斯的医生自法律实施以来收到的安乐死请求比例较高。在安乐死请求的情况下,瓦隆大区的医生较少咨询独立医生。在佛兰德斯,安乐死请求更经常得到批准(51%对 38%),并且安乐死实施案例更经常得到报告(73%对 58%)。该研究指出,在实践、知识和对安乐死及其法律要求的态度方面,佛兰德斯和瓦隆大区之间存在一些显著差异,这些差异可能解释了报告的安乐死案例数量在瓦隆大区和佛兰德斯之间的差异。文化因素似乎在(合法)安乐死的实践和法律保障的遵守程度方面发挥了重要作用。