• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在法国,医用口罩对医护人员的有效性。

Effectiveness of respirator masks for healthcare workers, in France.

机构信息

Groupe d'Étude sur le Risque d'Exposition des Soignants aux Agents Infectieux-GERES, Faculté de Médecine Xavier-Bichat, 16 Rue Henri-Huchard, 75018 Paris, France.

出版信息

Med Mal Infect. 2012 Jun;42(6):264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.medmal.2012.05.001
PMID:22683102
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors had for objective to evaluate the air-tightness of FFP2 respirator masks used by healthcare workers, with a quantitative fit-test protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This test measures the number of ambient particles inside and outside the respirator mask. The ratio between both is called fit-factor. The fit-test is successful for an FFP2 respirator mask when the fit-factor is equal or superior to 100. The tests were performed in three hospitals. Nine types of FFP2 respirator masks were fit-tested, classified in three groups: hard shell, duckbill, and flat-fold respirator masks.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty fit-tests were performed. Less than a third of the fit-tests were successful (35/130). The rate of successful tests was higher with flat-fold (57.5%, 23/40) than with duckbill (18.3%, 11/60), or hard shell respirator masks (3.3%, 1/30), (P<0.05). Zero to 60% of healthcare workers had a successful fit-test with the respirator masks used in each hospital. This percentage increased with the number of tested respirator masks. No 100% success rate was ever reached in any hospital with the three tested respirator masks.

CONCLUSION

Duckbill, and flat-fold respirator masks seem to be better adapted for healthcare workers than hard shell respirator masks. It seems necessary to implement new recommendations for respiratory protection in France. At least two types of respirator masks with various sizes and shape should be available and fitting controls should be performed with respirator masks that are worn by healthcare workers exposed to infectious risks.

摘要

目的

作者旨在通过定量贴合测试方案评估医护人员使用的 FFP2 防护口罩的气密性。

材料与方法

该测试测量口罩内外的环境粒子数。两者的比值称为贴合因子。FFP2 防护口罩的贴合测试成功标准为贴合因子等于或大于 100。测试在 3 家医院进行。对 9 种 FFP2 防护口罩进行了贴合测试,分为 3 组:硬壳、鸭嘴型和折叠型口罩。

结果

共进行了 180 次贴合测试。只有不到三分之一的测试成功(35/130)。折叠型口罩的成功率(57.5%,23/40)高于鸭嘴型(18.3%,11/60)或硬壳口罩(3.3%,1/30)(P<0.05)。每个医院使用的口罩,只有 0%至 60%的医护人员贴合测试成功。随着测试口罩数量的增加,成功率有所提高。在任何一家医院,都没有一种口罩能达到 100%的贴合成功率。

结论

与硬壳口罩相比,鸭嘴型和折叠型口罩似乎更适合医护人员。法国似乎有必要实施新的呼吸防护建议。至少应提供两种不同尺寸和形状的口罩,并应使用医护人员实际佩戴的口罩进行贴合控制,以保护其免受感染风险。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of respirator masks for healthcare workers, in France.在法国,医用口罩对医护人员的有效性。
Med Mal Infect. 2012 Jun;42(6):264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
2
Particulate face masks for protection against airborne pathogens - one size does not fit all: an observational study.颗粒物防护口罩预防空气传播病原体——并非“均码”适用:一项观察性研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2010 Mar;12(1):24-7.
3
Evaluation of a large-scale quantitative respirator-fit testing program for healthcare workers: survey results.大规模医护人员定量型呼吸防护具适配测试计划评估:调查结果。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;31(9):918-25. doi: 10.1086/655460.
4
[Use of respiratory masks in healthcare workers].[医护人员使用呼吸面罩的情况]
Med Mal Infect. 2008 Aug;38(8):452-6. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2008.06.022. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
5
Protecting staff against airborne viral particles: in vivo efficiency of laser masks.保护工作人员免受空气传播病毒颗粒的侵害:激光口罩的体内效率
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Nov;64(3):278-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.06.021. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
6
Real-time fit of a respirator during simulated health care tasks.在模拟医疗保健任务期间实时适配呼吸器。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(10):563-71. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.711699.
7
Effectiveness of three just-in-time training modalities for N-95 mask fit testing.三种N95口罩适合性测试即时培训模式的有效性
Am J Disaster Med. 2013 Autumn;8(4):283-6. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2013.0135.
8
N95 respirators: quantitative fit test pass rates and usability and comfort assessment by health care workers.N95 呼吸器:医护人员定量贴合度测试通过率以及可用性和舒适度评估。
Med J Aust. 2022 Jul 18;217(2):88-93. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51585. Epub 2022 May 29.
9
[Evaluation of quantitative fit-testing of N95 filtering facepiece respirators using Mask-Fitting Tester and improvement of mask fitting by instruction].[使用口罩贴合度测试仪对N95过滤式面罩呼吸器进行定量贴合度测试的评估以及通过指导改进口罩贴合度]
Kekkaku. 2004 Jul;79(7):443-8.
10
Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.三种不同类型呼吸防护装置的性能比较。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2006 Sep;3(9):465-74. doi: 10.1080/15459620600829211.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of mask fit testing data associated with protocols utilized in evaluating the efficacy of N95 masks for health care workers.对与用于评估医护人员N95口罩功效的方案相关的口罩适配性测试数据的综述。
J Infect Prev. 2024 Jul 20:17571774241266400. doi: 10.1177/17571774241266400.
2
Striving to be the fittest: quantitative P2/N95 respirator fit test results among hospital staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.努力做到最适配:新冠疫情期间医院工作人员的定量P2/N95呼吸器适配测试结果
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 15;3(1):e233. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.503. eCollection 2023.
3
The effect of N95 designs on respirator fit and its associations with gender and facial dimensions.
N95 设计对呼吸器贴合度的影响及其与性别和面部尺寸的关系。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 29;18(11):e0288105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288105. eCollection 2023.
4
A systematic review of passing fit testing of the masks and respirators used during the COVID-19 pandemic: Part 1-quantitative fit test procedures.COVID-19 大流行期间使用的口罩和呼吸器的通过率测试的系统评价:第 1 部分——定量贴合测试程序。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0293129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293129. eCollection 2023.
5
The Ultra fit community mask-Toward maximal respiratory protection via personalized face fit.超贴合型社区口罩——通过个性化面部贴合实现最大呼吸保护。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0281050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281050. eCollection 2023.
6
P2/N95 filtering facepiece respirators: Results of a large-scale quantitative mask fit testing program in Australian health care workers.P2/N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器:澳大利亚医护人员大规模定量口罩适配测试计划的结果。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 May;50(5):509-515. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.12.016. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
7
Fit Factor Change on Quantitative Fit Testing of Duckbill N95 Respirators with the Use of Safety Goggles.使用护目镜对鸭嘴式N95呼吸器进行定量适配性测试时的适配因素变化
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep;25(9):981-986. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23972.
8
The influence of gender and ethnicity on facemasks and respiratory protective equipment fit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.性别和种族对面罩和呼吸防护设备贴合度的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Nov;6(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005537.
9
Testing the Proper Fit Of Respirator Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic–A Study Among Medical Staff.在新冠疫情期间测试呼吸防护口罩的合适度——一项针对医务人员的研究
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Apr 9;118(14):250-251. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0186.
10
Aerosolised fluorescein can quantify FFP mask faceseal leakage: a cost-effective adaptation to the existing point of care fit test.雾化荧光素可量化FFP口罩面部密封泄漏:对现有即时护理贴合度测试的一种经济有效的改进。
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 May;21(3):e263-e268. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0982.