Small Animal Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 9, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
Vet J. 2012 Dec;194(3):433-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.04.030. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
The aim of this study was to assess agreement and repeatability of four ultrasound methods for measuring stroke volume (SV) and cardiac output (CO) in cats. Measurement of SV and CO was performed by the Teichholz method, the Simpson's method (SM), the area length method (ALM) and a volumetric flow method across the aorta (Trace method). For each method, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated and agreement was determined by Bland-Altman analysis. The CV was acceptable (<20%) for all parameters, except for SV and CO obtained by SM (28.8% and 22.4%, respectively) and ALM (21.6% and 22.6%, respectively). Narrow limits of agreement were observed between both planimetric methods (SM and ALM). The Trace method was the most repeatable, followed by the Teichholz method. Despite excellent inter-method agreement, neither of the planimetric methods produced results with adequate repeatability. As the Teichholz and Trace methods were acceptably repeatable, and probably gave the most representative values, they appear to be the most useful methods for the measurement of SV and CO in cats. Further investigations are needed to compare the echocardiographic methods described here with a standard technique such as thermodilution.
本研究旨在评估四种超声方法测量猫的每搏量(SV)和心输出量(CO)的一致性和可重复性。SV 和 CO 的测量分别采用了 Teichholz 法、Simpson 法(SM)、面积长度法(ALM)和主动脉容积流量法(Trace 法)。对于每种方法,均计算了变异系数(CV),并通过 Bland-Altman 分析确定了一致性。除了 SM 和 ALM 分别获得的 SV 和 CO(分别为 28.8%和 22.4%和 21.6%和 22.6%)外,所有参数的 CV 均为可接受的(<20%)。两种平面测量法(SM 和 ALM)之间观察到的一致性界限较窄。Trace 法的可重复性最高,其次是 Teichholz 法。尽管不同方法之间的一致性很好,但两种平面测量法的结果均不具有足够的可重复性。由于 Teichholz 和 Trace 法具有可接受的可重复性,并且可能提供了最有代表性的数值,因此它们似乎是测量猫的 SV 和 CO 的最有用的方法。需要进一步的研究来比较这里描述的超声心动图方法与热稀释等标准技术。