• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)药品安全通讯:老年患者的叙述性综述及临床考量

FDA drug safety communications: a narrative review and clinical considerations for older adults.

作者信息

Marcum Zachary A, Vande Griend Joseph P, Linnebur Sunny A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Aug;10(4):264-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.05.002
PMID:22683398
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3413741/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has new regulatory authorities intended to enhance drug safety monitoring in the postmarketing period. This has resulted in an increase in communication from the FDA in recent years about the safety profile of certain drugs. It is important to stay abreast of the current literature on drug risks to effectively communicate these risks to patients, other health care providers, and the general public.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize 4 new FDA drug safety communications by describing the evidence supporting the risks and the clinical implications for older adults.

METHODS

The FDA Web site was reviewed for new drug safety communications from May 2011 to April 2012 that would be relevant to older adults. Approved labeling for each drug or class was obtained from the manufacturer, and PubMed was searched for primary literature that supported the drug safety concern.

RESULTS

FDA drug safety communications for 4 drugs were chosen because of the potential clinical importance in older adults. A warning for citalopram was made because of potential problems with QT prolongation in patients taking less than 40 mg per day. The evidence suggests minor changes in QT interval. Given the flat dose-response curve in treating depression with citalopram, the new 20-mg/d maximum dose in older adults is sensible. Another warning was made for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and an increased risk of Clostridium difficile infection. A dose-response relationship was found for this drug risk. With C. difficile infections on the rise in older adults, along with other safety risks of PPI therapy, PPIs should only be used in older adults indicated for therapy for the shortest duration possible. In addition, a warning about dabigatran was made. There is strong evidence from a large clinical trial, as well as case reports, of increased bleeding risk in older adults taking dabigatran, especially in older adults with decreased renal function. This medication should be used with caution in older adults. Finally, several warnings were made about statins. Routine periodic monitoring of liver enzymes does not appear to be effective in detecting or preventing serious liver injury from statin use; thus, liver enzymes are no longer recommended to be routinely monitored. Statin-induced cognitive changes are rare, and insufficient evidence is currently available to establish causality. Statins appear to moderately increase the risk of developing diabetes (versus placebo), and regular screening for diabetes should be considered, especially for patients taking high-dose statins and patients with multiple risk factors for diabetes.

CONCLUSION

FDA drug safety communications incorporate complex methodologies that investigate the risks (and relative benefits) of medication therapy. Clinicians caring for older adults need to be aware of the most current evidence behind these drug risks to effectively communicate with and care for their patients.

摘要

背景

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)拥有新的监管权力,旨在加强上市后药品安全性监测。这导致近年来FDA关于某些药物安全性概况的沟通有所增加。及时了解有关药物风险的最新文献对于有效地向患者、其他医疗保健提供者和公众传达这些风险非常重要。

目的

通过描述支持风险的证据以及对老年人的临床意义,总结FDA的4项新的药品安全沟通。

方法

审查FDA网站,查找2011年5月至2012年4月与老年人相关的新药品安全沟通。从制造商处获取每种药物或药物类别的批准标签,并在PubMed上搜索支持该药物安全问题的原始文献。

结果

选择了4种药物的FDA药品安全沟通,因为它们对老年人具有潜在的临床重要性。对西酞普兰发出警告,因为每天服用剂量低于40毫克的患者存在QT间期延长的潜在问题。证据表明QT间期有轻微变化。鉴于西酞普兰治疗抑郁症时剂量反应曲线较为平缓,老年人新的每日最大剂量20毫克是合理的。对质子泵抑制剂(PPI)发出另一项警告,其艰难梭菌感染风险增加。发现了这种药物风险的剂量反应关系。随着老年人艰难梭菌感染率上升,以及PPI治疗的其他安全风险,PPI仅应用于有明确治疗指征的老年人,且使用时间应尽可能短。此外,对达比加群发出警告。一项大型临床试验以及病例报告提供了有力证据,表明服用达比加群的老年人出血风险增加,尤其是肾功能减退的老年人。这种药物在老年人中应谨慎使用。最后,对他汀类药物发出了几项警告。定期常规监测肝酶似乎无法有效检测或预防他汀类药物使用导致的严重肝损伤;因此,不再建议常规监测肝酶。他汀类药物引起的认知变化很少见,目前尚无足够证据确定因果关系。他汀类药物似乎会适度增加患糖尿病的风险(与安慰剂相比),应考虑定期筛查糖尿病,特别是对于服用高剂量他汀类药物的患者以及有多种糖尿病风险因素的患者。

结论

FDA的药品安全沟通采用了复杂的方法来调查药物治疗的风险(和相对益处)。照顾老年人的临床医生需要了解这些药物风险背后的最新证据,以便有效地与患者沟通并提供护理。

相似文献

1
FDA drug safety communications: a narrative review and clinical considerations for older adults.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)药品安全通讯:老年患者的叙述性综述及临床考量
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Aug;10(4):264-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
2
A year in review: new drugs for older adults in 2011.年度回顾:2011年用于老年人的新药
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Aug;10(4):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
3
Multimodal Analysis of FDA Drug Safety Communications: Lessons from Zolpidem.FDA 药物安全通讯的多模态分析:唑吡坦的经验教训。
Drug Saf. 2019 Nov;42(11):1287-1295. doi: 10.1007/s40264-019-00849-8.
4
Assessing Responsiveness of Health Systems to Drug Safety Warnings.评估卫生系统对药物安全警告的响应能力。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;26(4):476-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.09.024. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
5
Do FDA label changes work? Assessment of the 2010 class label change for proton pump inhibitors using the Sentinel System's analytic tools.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的标签变更是否有效?使用哨兵系统分析工具评估2010年质子泵抑制剂的类别标签变更。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):332-339. doi: 10.1002/pds.4392. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
6
Review of FDA Amendments Act Section 921 Experience in Posting Data-mining Results from the FAERS Database.美国食品和药物管理局修正案第 921 节对 FAERS 数据库数据挖掘结果公布经验的审查。
Clin Ther. 2021 Feb;43(2):380-395. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
7
Assuring safety of inherently unsafe medications: the FDA risk evaluation and mitigation strategies.确保本质上不安全药物的安全性:美国食品药品监督管理局的风险评估与缓解策略
J Med Toxicol. 2014 Jun;10(2):165-72. doi: 10.1007/s13181-013-0374-z.
8
Sources of Evidence Triggering and Supporting Safety-Related Labeling Changes: A 10-Year Longitudinal Assessment of 22 New Molecular Entities Approved in 2008 by the US Food and Drug Administration.引发并支持与安全性相关标签变更的证据来源:对美国食品药品监督管理局2008年批准的22种新分子实体进行的10年纵向评估
Drug Saf. 2022 Feb;45(2):169-180. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01142-3. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
9
Unintended Consequences of Adjusting Citalopram Prescriptions Following the 2011 FDA Warning.2011年美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发出警告后调整西酞普兰处方的意外后果。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;25(4):407-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
10
A decade of safety-related regulatory action in the Netherlands: a retrospective analysis of direct healthcare professional communications from 1999 to 2009.荷兰十年来与安全相关的监管行动:对 1999 年至 2009 年直接与医疗保健专业人员沟通的回顾性分析。
Drug Saf. 2010 Jun 1;33(6):463-74. doi: 10.2165/11532840-000000000-00000.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive assessment of TECENTRIQ® and OPDIVO®: analyzing immunotherapy indications withdrawn in triple-negative breast cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma.特善奇®和欧狄沃®的全面评估:分析免疫疗法在三阴性乳腺癌和肝细胞癌中被撤销的适应证。
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2024 Sep;43(3):889-918. doi: 10.1007/s10555-024-10174-x. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
Non-Pharmacological Pain Management in Labor: A Systematic Review.分娩期非药物性疼痛管理:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 21;12(23):7203. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237203.
3
Potential Effect of Baobab's Polyphenols as Antihyperlipidemic Agents: In Silico Study.百香果皮多酚作为抗高血脂药物的潜在作用:计算机模拟研究。
Molecules. 2023 Aug 17;28(16):6112. doi: 10.3390/molecules28166112.
4
Autoimmunity associates with severity of illness in elderly patients with drug-induced liver injury.自身免疫与老年药物性肝损伤患者的疾病严重程度相关。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Feb 16;14:1071709. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1071709. eCollection 2023.
5
Statins Use in Alzheimer Disease: Bane or Boon from Frantic Search and Narrative Review.他汀类药物在阿尔茨海默病中的应用:疯狂探索与叙述性综述的祸还是福
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 24;12(10):1290. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101290.
6
[Effect of the direct healthcare professional communication on citalopram and escitalopram drug utilization for inpatient treatment of anxiety disorders].[直接医疗专业人员沟通对西酞普兰和艾司西酞普兰用于焦虑症住院治疗的药物使用情况的影响]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Nov;65(11):1204-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03594-z. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
7
Agitation and Dementia: Prevention and Treatment Strategies in Acute and Chronic Conditions.躁动与痴呆:急慢性病症的预防与治疗策略
Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 16;12:644317. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.644317. eCollection 2021.
8
Effect of Switching from Low-Dose Simvastatin to High-Dose Atorvastatin on Glucose Homeostasis and Cognitive Function in Type 2 Diabetes.从低剂量辛伐他汀转换为高剂量阿托伐他汀对2型糖尿病患者血糖稳态及认知功能的影响
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2020 Sep 21;16:367-377. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S270751. eCollection 2020.
9
Low corticosterone levels attenuate late life depression and enhance glutamatergic neurotransmission in female rats.低皮质酮水平可减轻老年期抑郁,并增强雌性大鼠的谷氨酸能神经传递。
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2021 Jun;42(6):848-860. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-00536-w. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
10
Effect of Combined Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Therapies on Cognitive Function: A New Treatment Strategy?联合降压降脂治疗对认知功能的影响:一种新的治疗策略?
Cardiol Res Pract. 2020 Apr 14;2020:1484357. doi: 10.1155/2020/1484357. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Statins: is it really time to reassess benefits and risks?他汀类药物:真的是重新评估其益处和风险的时候了吗?
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 10;366(19):1752-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1203020. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
2
Is statin-associated cognitive impairment clinically relevant? A narrative review and clinical recommendations.他汀类药物相关认知功能障碍是否具有临床相关性?一项叙述性综述和临床建议。
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Apr;46(4):549-57. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q620. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
3
Clinical challenges in a patient with dabigatran-induced fatal hemorrhage.达比加群酯致致命性出血患者的临床挑战
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Apr;10(2):160-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
4
American Geriatrics Society updated Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults.美国老年医学学会更新了老年人潜在不适当药物使用的 Beers 标准。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Apr;60(4):616-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03923.x. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
5
Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.心房颤动的抗血栓治疗:抗血栓治疗和血栓预防,第 9 版:美国胸科医师学会基于证据的临床实践指南。
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e531S-e575S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2304.
6
Impact of FDA drug risk communications on health care utilization and health behaviors: a systematic review.FDA 药物风险沟通对医疗利用和健康行为的影响:系统评价。
Med Care. 2012 Jun;50(6):466-78. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318245a160.
7
The US Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel Initiative: expanding the horizons of medical product safety.美国食品药品监督管理局的哨兵计划:拓展医疗产品安全的视野。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jan;21 Suppl 1:9-11. doi: 10.1002/pds.2311.
8
Clostridium difficile infection in older adults: a review and update on its management.老年人艰难梭菌感染:管理方面的综述与更新
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2012 Feb;10(1):14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
9
A critical evaluation of the cardiac toxicity of citalopram: part 2.西酞普兰心脏毒性的批判性评估:第2部分。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2011 Dec;49(12):13-6. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20111102-04. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
10
A critical evaluation of the cardiac toxicity of citalopram: part 1.西酞普兰心脏毒性的批判性评估:第1部分。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2011 Nov;49(11):13-6. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20111011-01. Epub 2011 Oct 19.