Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Department of Ecohydrology, Müggelseedamm 310, D-12587 Berlin, Germany.
Water Res. 2012 Sep 1;46(13):4153-63. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.024. Epub 2012 May 23.
Lake Tegel (Berlin, Germany) is controlled by two main inflows: inflow #1 (River Havel) is heavily phosphorus-laden, whereas inflow #2 is an artificial confluence that includes discharge from a municipal wastewater treatment plant distinguished by high levels of phosphorus and pharmaceuticals. To reduce the phosphorus load on the lake, a phosphorus elimination plant (PEP) is situated at inflow #2. Moreover, the two inflows are short-circuited by a pipeline that transfers part of the inflow #1 water to the PEP and finally releases it into inflow #2. The pipeline and the PEP have contributed to a continuous reduction in the total phosphorus concentration of Lake Tegel in the past 25 years. We investigate the question of whether the existing lake pipeline can also be used to reduce the amount of pharmaceuticals in Lake Tegel originating from inflow #2 by dilution with water from River Havel, by diverting part of inflow #2 around the lake, or by a combination of both strategies. The circulation pattern of Lake Tegel is complicated by complex bathymetry and numerous islands and is therefore highly sensitive to winds. We tested seven different management scenarios by hydrodynamic modeling for a period of 16 years with the two-dimensional version of the Princeton Ocean Model (POM). None of the scenarios provided a strategy optimal for both pharmaceuticals and phosphorus. Nonetheless, compound regimes, such as alternating the pipe flow direction or adding another pipeline, allowed the most abundant pharmaceutical (carbamazepine) to be reduced while maintaining the current phosphorus level. This study demonstrates the ability of immediate lake regulation measures to maintain water quality. In the case of Lake Tegel, the pipeline can be fully effective with regard to pharmaceuticals only in combination with additional efforts such as advanced pharmaceutical treatment of wastewater and/or phosphorus reduction in the River Havel catchment.
德国柏林的特格尔湖(Lake Tegel)有两个主要的入流:入流 1(哈弗尔河)富含大量磷,而入流 2 是一个人工汇合处,其中包括来自城市污水处理厂的排放,其特点是磷和药物含量高。为了减少湖泊中的磷负荷,在入流 2 处设置了一个除磷厂(PEP)。此外,两条入流通过一条管道短路,该管道将部分入流 1 的水输送到 PEP,最终将其释放到入流 2 中。在过去的 25 年中,该管道和 PEP 的存在促成了特格尔湖总磷浓度的持续降低。我们调查了以下问题:现有的湖泊管道是否还可以通过用哈弗尔河的水稀释来自入流 2 的药物,或者通过将部分入流 2 绕过湖泊来减少来自入流 2 的特格尔湖中药物的含量,或者通过这两种策略的组合来实现。特格尔湖的循环模式因复杂的水深和众多岛屿而变得复杂,因此对风非常敏感。我们通过二维普林斯顿海洋模型(POM)的水动力模型测试了七种不同的管理方案,为期 16 年。没有一种方案为药物和磷提供了最佳策略。尽管如此,如交替管道水流方向或增加另一条管道等复合方案,可在维持当前磷水平的同时减少最丰富的药物(卡马西平)。本研究表明,即时湖泊调节措施有能力维持水质。就特格尔湖而言,只有与其他措施(如废水的先进药物处理和/或哈弗尔河流域的磷减少)相结合,管道才能在药物方面完全有效。