Shaffer Catherine, Gatner Dylan, Gray Andrew L, Douglas Kevin S, Viljoen Jodi L, Tweed Roger, Bhatt Gira, Dooley Stephen, Gagnon Nathalie
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
Applied Criminology, Mid Sweden University, Holmgatan 10, 851 70, Sundsvall, SE, Sweden.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Nov;44(8):1599-1612. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0130-3.
The Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) is a well-supported tool for assessing psychopathic features in youth. However, most research with the APSD has been derived from clinical and forensic samples comprised mainly of male Caucasian and African American adolescents. In this prospective study, the incremental and predictive validity of the self-report APSD for violent and non-violent offending was examined in an ethnically diverse community sample of male and female youth (N = 335) aged 12 to 14. High-school students from a moderate sized city in Western Canada completed the self-report APSD and then completed the Self-Report of Offending 6 months later. Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis indicated that APSD total and subscale scores were predictive of violent and non-violent offending at 6-month follow-up with moderate to large effect sizes. In addition, total scores on the APSD added incremental predictive utility above and beyond traditional criminogenic predictors of youth offending (i.e., prior offending, delinquent peer affiliation, poor school achievement, substance use, low parental monitoring). Although sex differences emerged in the predictive utility of the Impulsivity subscale of the APSD vis-à-vis violent offending, sex did not moderate the relationship between APSD total, Narcissism, or Callous/Unemotional scores and offending. In addition, the predictive utility of the APSD did not vary as a function of the youth's ethnic background. These findings suggest that: (1) the self-report APSD may have utility for risk or threat assessment with normative school populations, (2) APSD findings from higher risk samples generalize to a lower risk sample of high-school youth, and (3) predictive utility of APSD total scores do not differ across male and female Caucasian and ethnic minority youth.
反社会行为筛查工具(APSD)是一种评估青少年心理病态特征的有力工具。然而,大多数关于APSD的研究都来自临床和法医样本,主要由白人、非裔美国男性青少年组成。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们在一个12至14岁、种族多样的社区样本(N = 335)中,检验了自我报告式APSD对暴力和非暴力犯罪的增量效度和预测效度。来自加拿大西部一个中等规模城市的高中生完成了自我报告式APSD,6个月后又完成了犯罪行为自我报告。接受者操作特征分析表明,在6个月的随访中,APSD总分及各子量表得分对暴力和非暴力犯罪具有预测性,效应量为中等至较大。此外,APSD总分在预测青少年犯罪方面,除了传统的犯罪成因预测因素(即既往犯罪、不良同伴关系、学业成绩差、物质使用、父母监管不足)之外,还具有额外的预测效用。虽然APSD冲动性子量表在预测暴力犯罪方面存在性别差异,但性别并未调节APSD总分、自恋或冷酷/无情得分与犯罪之间的关系。此外,APSD的预测效用并不因青少年的种族背景而有所不同。这些发现表明:(1)自我报告式APSD可能对正常学校人群的风险或威胁评估有用;(2)来自高风险样本的APSD研究结果可以推广到低风险的高中青少年样本;(3)APSD总分的预测效用在白人、少数族裔青少年的男性和女性中没有差异。