Suppr超能文献

你的结直肠癌患病风险指数是一种在筛查结肠镜检查中用于高级结直肠肿瘤的不准确风险分层工具。

The Your Disease Risk Index for colorectal cancer is an inaccurate risk stratification tool for advanced colorectal neoplasia at screening colonoscopy.

机构信息

Boston Medical Center, 85 E. Concord St., Suite 7715, Boston, MA 02118, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012 Aug;5(8):1044-52. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0014. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

Abstract

Tailoring the use of screening colonoscopy based on the risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) could optimize the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Our goal was to assess the accuracy of the Your Disease Risk (YDR) CRC risk index for stratifying average risk patients into low- versus intermediate/high-risk categories for ACN. The YDR risk assessment tool was administered to 3,317 asymptomatic average risk patients 50 to 79 years of age just before their screening colonoscopy. Associations between YDR-derived relative risk (RR) scores and ACN prevalence were examined using logistic regression and χ(2) analyses. ACN was defined as a tubular adenoma ≥1 cm, tubulovillous or villous adenoma of any size, and the presence of high-grade dysplasia or cancer. The overall prevalence of ACN was 5.6%. Although YDR-derived RR scores were linearly associated with ACN after adjusting for age and gender (P = 0.033), the index was unable to discriminate "below average" from "above/average" risk patients [OR, 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-1.37]. Considerable overlap in rates of ACN was also observed between the different YDR risk categories in our age- and gender-stratified analyses. The YDR index lacks accuracy for stratifying average risk patients into low- versus intermediate/high-risk categories for ACN.

摘要

根据进展期结直肠肿瘤(ACN)的风险定制筛查结肠镜检查,可优化结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的成本效益。我们的目标是评估您的疾病风险(YDR)CRC 风险指数在将平均风险患者分层为低风险与中/高风险 ACN 类别方面的准确性。在进行筛查结肠镜检查之前,对 3317 名 50 至 79 岁的无症状平均风险患者进行了 YDR 风险评估工具的评估。使用逻辑回归和 χ(2)分析检验 YDR 衍生的相对风险(RR)评分与 ACN 患病率之间的关联。ACN 的定义为管状腺瘤≥1cm、管状绒毛状或任何大小的绒毛状腺瘤以及高级别异型增生或癌症的存在。ACN 的总体患病率为 5.6%。尽管在调整年龄和性别后,YDR 衍生的 RR 评分与 ACN 呈线性相关(P=0.033),但该指数无法区分“低于平均”与“高于/平均”风险患者[比值比(OR),1.01;95%置信区间(CI),0.75-1.37]。在我们的年龄和性别分层分析中,不同 YDR 风险类别之间也观察到 ACN 发生率的明显重叠。YDR 指数在将平均风险患者分层为低风险与中/高风险 ACN 类别方面缺乏准确性。

相似文献

1
The Your Disease Risk Index for colorectal cancer is an inaccurate risk stratification tool for advanced colorectal neoplasia at screening colonoscopy.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2012 Aug;5(8):1044-52. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-12-0014. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
2
A Risk Prediction Index for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia at Screening Colonoscopy.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;110(7):1062-71. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.146. Epub 2015 May 26.
4
Risk of Advanced Neoplasia Using the National Cancer Institute's Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment Tool.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Aug 31;109(1). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw181. Print 2017 Jan.
5
7
A scoring model for predicting advanced colorectal neoplasia in a screened population of asymptomatic Japanese individuals.
J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct;53(10):1109-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-1433-7. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of risk-stratified bowel screening: current evidence, future directions.
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 May;33(5):653-685. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01568-9. Epub 2022 Mar 20.
3
Multifactorial causal beliefs and colorectal cancer screening: A structural equation modeling investigation.
J Health Psychol. 2022 Sep;27(11):2463-2477. doi: 10.1177/13591053211037737. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
5
Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2016 Jan;9(1):13-26. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0274. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
6
Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Behav Med. 2015 Dec;38(6):837-50. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9668-8. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
7
A Risk Prediction Index for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia at Screening Colonoscopy.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul;110(7):1062-71. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.146. Epub 2015 May 26.
8
The impact of stratifying by family history in colorectal cancer screening programs.
Int J Cancer. 2015 Sep 1;137(5):1119-27. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29473. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
9
Family history and the natural history of colorectal cancer: systematic review.
Genet Med. 2015 Sep;17(9):702-12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.188. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
10
Do recent epidemiologic observations impact who and how we should screen for CRC?
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Mar;60(3):781-94. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3467-x. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Derivation and validation of a prediction rule for estimating advanced colorectal neoplasm risk in average-risk Chinese.
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Mar 15;175(6):584-93. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr337. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
2
Risk prediction models for colorectal cancer: a review.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Mar;21(3):398-410. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0771. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
3
Association of type 2 diabetes and colon adenomas.
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2012 Mar;43(1):87-92. doi: 10.1007/s12029-011-9316-7.
4
Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Jul-Aug;61(4):212-36. doi: 10.3322/caac.20121. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
5
A systematic comparison of microsimulation models of colorectal cancer: the role of assumptions about adenoma progression.
Med Decis Making. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):530-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11408730. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
6
High levels of folate from supplements and fortification are not associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer.
Gastroenterology. 2011 Jul;141(1):98-105, 105.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
9
Folate intake and risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma: modification by time.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Apr;93(4):817-25. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.007781. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
10
The clinical significance of serrated polyps.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;106(2):229-40; quiz 241. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.429. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验