Laboratoire de Chimie et de Physique Quantiques, IRSAMC, Université de Toulouse III, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cédex 04, France.
Inorg Chem. 2012 Jul 2;51(13):7112-8. doi: 10.1021/ic2027237. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
The large antiferromagnetic coupling in the Mn(IV)-Mn(IV) bond in the Li(6)Ca(2)[Mn(2)N(6)] and Li(6)Sr(2)[Mn(2)N(6)] crystals (J = -739 and -478 cm(-1), respectively, with H = -JS(A)·S(B)) is studied using different theoretical methods: solid-state density functional theory calculations, molecular density functional theory, and post-Hartree-Fock calculations with large embeddings. This magnetic coupling is a challenge for theoretical methods because both correlation and polarization effects are crucial for the correct description of the bond. All methods predict a large antiferromagnetic coupling, but none of the considered methods give a quantitative agreement with the experimental values. The molecular methods, except B3LYP and CASPT2, underestimate the coupling for the calcium compound, while they overestimate it in the strontium compound, within 30%. These methods, on the other hand, strongly underestimate the decrease of the coupling between the two compounds, with the most correlated one predicting the same value for both compounds. The solid-state method overestimates the coupling within 60% but reproduces better their ratio. Analysis of the calculations shows that the magnetic coupling between the local π orbitals is not caused by a direct interaction but by the spin-polarized σ bond.
使用不同的理论方法研究了 Li(6)Ca(2)[Mn(2)N(6)] 和 Li(6)Sr(2)[Mn(2)N(6)] 晶体中 Mn(IV)-Mn(IV)键中的大反铁磁耦合(J 分别为-739 和-478 cm(-1),具有 H = -JS(A)·S(B)):固态密度泛函理论计算、分子密度泛函理论和大嵌入的后哈特ree-fock 计算。这种磁耦合对理论方法来说是一个挑战,因为相关和极化效应对于正确描述键都是至关重要的。所有方法都预测了大的反铁磁耦合,但没有一种方法与实验值具有定量的一致性。除了 B3LYP 和 CASPT2 之外,分子方法都低估了钙化合物的耦合,而在锶化合物中则高估了 30%。这些方法另一方面强烈低估了两个化合物之间耦合的减小,最相关的方法预测两个化合物具有相同的值。固态方法高估了 60%的耦合,但更好地再现了它们的比值。计算分析表明,局部π轨道之间的磁耦合不是由直接相互作用引起的,而是由自旋极化的σ键引起的。