Suppr超能文献

三种不同的毛细血管镜检查方法评估系统性硬化症的毛细血管密度。

Assessment of capillary density in systemic sclerosis with three different capillaroscopic methods.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2 Suppl 71):S50-4. Epub 2012 May 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Capillary abnormalities, such as the enlargement and/or disappearance of capillary loops, occur early in the majority of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim of this study was to compare three capillaroscopic methods of determining the capillary density in patients with SSc.

METHODS

Two of the three methods involved stereo-zoom microscopy at a magnification of 20 times, used either for direct counting, or with a camera and imaging software for determination of the capillary density on coded images. The third method was computerised nailfold video capillaroscopy with 300 x magnification using coded images. The capillary density (loops/mm) was determined on the fourth finger of the non-dominant hand with all three methods in 40 patients, 32 with limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and 8 with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc), and in 21 healthy control subjects.

RESULTS

The median values of capillary density assessed with the three methods were: 4.3, 5.4 and 6.1 loops/mm in lc-SSc patients, 4.5, 5.0 and 6.3 loops/mm in dcSSc patients, and 7.0, 7.0 and 6.9 loops/mm in the controls. Capillary density was thus lower in lcSSc and dcSSc patients than in the controls according to all three methods. Agreement between the three methods was good in the controls. In patients, direct counting resulted in lower values than in the two computer-based methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of capillary density with three different methods showed good agreement between methods. All methods could differentiate between SSc patients and controls.

摘要

目的

毛细血管异常,如毛细血管袢的扩大和/或消失,在大多数系统性硬皮病(SSc)患者中早期出现。本研究旨在比较三种用于确定 SSc 患者毛细血管密度的方法。

方法

三种方法中的两种涉及放大 20 倍的立体缩放显微镜,一种用于直接计数,另一种用于通过摄像头和成像软件对编码图像上的毛细血管密度进行测定。第三种方法是使用编码图像的 300 倍计算机化甲褶视频毛细血管镜检。用三种方法分别在 40 例患者、32 例局限性皮肤型 SSc(lcSSc)和 8 例弥漫性皮肤型 SSc(dcSSc)和 21 例健康对照者的非优势手第四指上测定毛细血管密度(环/毫米)。

结果

三种方法评估的毛细血管密度中位数为:lcSSc 患者为 4.3、5.4 和 6.1 环/毫米,dcSSc 患者为 4.5、5.0 和 6.3 环/毫米,对照组为 7.0、7.0 和 6.9 环/毫米。根据所有三种方法,lcSSc 和 dcSSc 患者的毛细血管密度均低于对照组。三种方法在对照组中具有良好的一致性。在患者中,直接计数的结果低于两种基于计算机的方法。

结论

三种不同方法评估的毛细血管密度具有良好的一致性。所有方法均能区分 SSc 患者和对照组。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验