Origasa H, Knoke J D
Eisai Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Environ Health Perspect. 1990 Jul;87:143-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9087143.
This study extensively compares two statistical models for the analysis of binary data from longitudinal studies. The first model was proposed by Zeger, Liang, and Self, which was abbreviated as ZLS model and another model was proposed by Origasa. The comparison focuses on both analytical and statistical view-points. The first discusses a type of the models and the second evaluates the effect from model misspecification by stimulation, assuming that the ZLS model is true.
本研究广泛比较了两种用于分析纵向研究中二元数据的统计模型。第一种模型由泽格（Zeger）、梁（Liang）和塞尔夫（Self）提出，简称为ZLS模型，另一种模型由折笠（Origasa）提出。比较聚焦于分析和统计两个视角。第一个视角讨论模型的类型，第二个视角通过模拟评估模型误设产生的影响，假设ZLS模型是正确的。
