• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子数据方法(EDM)论坛用于比较效果研究(CER)。

The Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum for comparative effectiveness research (CER).

机构信息

Electronic Data Methods Forum, AcademyHealth, Washington, DC 20036, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S7-10. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318257a66b.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318257a66b
PMID:22692262
Abstract

BACKGROUND

AcademyHealth convened the Electronic Data Methods (EDM) Forum to collect, synthesize, and share lessons from eleven projects that are building infrastructure and using electronic clinical data for comparative effectiveness research (CER) and patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR). This paper provides a brief review of participating projects and provides a framework of common challenges.

METHODS

EDM Forum staff conducted a text review of relevant grant programs' funding opportunity announcements; projects' research plans; and available information on projects' websites. Additional information was obtained from presentations provided by each project; phone calls with project principal investigators, affiliated partners, and staff from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); and six site visits.

RESULTS

Projects participating in the EDM Forum are building infrastructure and developing innovative strategies to address a set of methodological, and data and informatics challenges, here identified in a common framework. The eleven networks represent more than 20 states and include a range of partnership models. Projects vary substantially in size, from 11,000 to more than 7.5 million individuals. Nearly all of the AHRQ priority populations and conditions are addressed.

DISCUSSION

In partnership with the projects, the EDM Forum is focused on identifying and sharing lessons learned to advance the national dialogue on the use of electronic clinical data to conduct CER and PCOR. These efforts have the shared goal of addressing challenges in traditional research studies and data sources, and aim to build infrastructure and generate evidence to support a learning health care system that can improve patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

学院健康协会召集电子数据方法(EDM)论坛,以收集、综合和分享十一个项目的经验教训,这些项目正在为比较有效性研究(CER)和以患者为中心的结果研究(PCOR)构建基础设施并使用电子临床数据。本文简要回顾了参与项目,并提供了一个常见挑战的框架。

方法

EDM 论坛工作人员对相关资助计划的资助机会公告、项目研究计划以及项目网站上提供的可用信息进行了文本审查。还通过每个项目的演示文稿、与项目首席研究员、附属合作伙伴以及美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)的工作人员的电话、以及六次现场访问获得了额外的信息。

结果

参与 EDM 论坛的项目正在构建基础设施,并制定创新战略,以解决一组方法学、数据和信息学挑战,这些挑战在一个共同的框架中被确定。这十一个网络代表了 20 多个州,包括一系列伙伴关系模式。项目的规模差异很大,从 11000 人到 750 多万人不等。几乎所有 AHRQ 优先人群和条件都得到了解决。

讨论

与项目合作,EDM 论坛专注于确定和分享经验教训,以推进关于使用电子临床数据进行 CER 和 PCOR 的全国对话。这些努力的共同目标是解决传统研究和数据源中的挑战,并旨在建立基础设施和生成证据,以支持能够改善患者结果的学习型医疗保健系统。

相似文献

1
The Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum for comparative effectiveness research (CER).电子数据方法(EDM)论坛用于比较效果研究(CER)。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S7-10. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318257a66b.
2
EDM forum supplement overview.EDM 论坛增刊概览。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S1-2. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182588ef7.
3
Opportunities and challenges for comparative effectiveness research (CER) with Electronic Clinical Data: a perspective from the EDM forum.电子临床数据下比较有效性研究(CER)的机遇与挑战:EDM 论坛观点。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S11-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318258530f.
4
Building sustainable multi-functional prospective electronic clinical data systems.构建可持续的多功能前瞻性电子临床数据系统。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S3-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182588ed1.
5
Lessons from the Electronic Data Methods Forum: collaboration at the frontier of comparative effectiveness research, patient-centered outcomes research, and quality improvement.电子数据方法论坛的经验教训:在比较效果研究、以患者为中心的结果研究和质量改进的前沿进行合作。
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8 Suppl 3):S1-3. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829c518f.
6
Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum building the infrastructure to conduct comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research using electronic clinical data.电子数据方法(EDM)论坛正在构建基础设施,以利用电子临床数据开展比较效果研究和以患者为中心的结局研究。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:ii. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000415794.61659.51.
7
Building the informatics infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research (CER): a review of the literature.构建比较疗效研究(CER)的信息学基础设施:文献回顾。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S38-48. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259becd.
8
Infrastructure to support learning health systems: are we there yet? Innovative solutions and lessons learned from American Recovery and Reinvestment Act CER investments.支持学习型卫生系统的基础设施:我们做到了吗?创新解决方案及从《美国复苏与再投资法案》的比较效果研究投资中汲取的经验教训。
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Nov;3(6):635-45. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.72.
9
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
10
Informatics in action: lessons learned in comparative effectiveness research.实践中的信息学:比较效力研究中的经验教训。
Cancer J. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):235-8. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31822c3944.

引用本文的文献

1
Linking a Consortium-Wide Data Quality Assessment Tool with the MIRACUM Metadata Repository.将联盟范围内的数据质量评估工具与 MIRACUM 元数据存储库相链接。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):826-835. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1733847. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
2
Dynamic-ETL: a hybrid approach for health data extraction, transformation and loading.动态ETL:一种用于健康数据提取、转换和加载的混合方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Sep 13;17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0532-3.
3
Leveraging dialog systems research to assist biomedical researchers' interrogation of Big Clinical Data.
利用对话系统研究协助生物医学研究人员对大型临床数据进行查询。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Jun;61:176-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
Facilitating biomedical researchers' interrogation of electronic health record data: Ideas from outside of biomedical informatics.促进生物医学研究人员对电子健康记录数据的查询:来自生物医学信息学领域之外的观点。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Apr;60:376-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
5
An Algorithm for Building an Electronic Database.一种构建电子数据库的算法。
Eplasty. 2016 Jan 8;16:e1. eCollection 2016.
6
Design and implementation of a privacy preserving electronic health record linkage tool in Chicago.芝加哥一种隐私保护电子健康记录链接工具的设计与实现
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Sep;22(5):1072-80. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv038. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
7
Transparent reporting of data quality in distributed data networks.分布式数据网络中数据质量的透明报告。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 Mar 23;3(1):1052. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1052. eCollection 2015.
8
Sustainability considerations for health research and analytic data infrastructures.健康研究与分析数据基础设施的可持续性考量
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Sep 17;2(2):1113. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1113. eCollection 2014.
9
Availability of structured and unstructured clinical data for comparative effectiveness research and quality improvement: a multisite assessment.用于比较效果研究和质量改进的结构化与非结构化临床数据的可获取性:一项多中心评估
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Jul 11;2(1):1079. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1079. eCollection 2014.
10
Preparing Electronic Clinical Data for Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research: The SCOAP CERTAIN Automation and Validation Project.为质量改进和比较效果研究准备电子临床数据:SCOAP CERTAIN自动化与验证项目
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Sep 10;1(1):1025. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1025. eCollection 2013.