Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 13;12:431. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-431.
Growing attention is given to the effects of health promotion programs targeting physical activity and healthy eating in individuals with mental disorders. The design of evaluation studies of public health interventions poses several problems and the current literature appears to provide only limited evidence on the effectiveness of such programs. The aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a health promotion intervention targeting physical activity and healthy eating in individuals with mental disorders living in sheltered housing. In this paper, the design of the study and baseline findings are described.
METHODS/DESIGN: The design consists of a cluster preference randomized controlled trial. All sheltered housing organisations in the Flanders region (Belgium) were asked if they were interested to participate in the study and if they were having a preference to serve as intervention or control group. Those without a preference were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Individuals in the intervention group receive a 10-week health promotion intervention above their treatment as usual. Outcome assessments occur at baseline, at 10 and at 36 weeks. The primary outcomes include body weight, Body Mass Index, waist circumference, and fat mass. Secondary outcomes consist of physical activity levels, eating habits, health-related quality of life and psychiatric symptom severity. Cost-effectiveness of the intervention will be examined by calculating the Cost-Effectiveness ratio and through economic modeling.Twenty-five sheltered housing organisations agreed to participate. On the individual level 324 patients were willing to participate, including 225 individuals in the intervention group and 99 individuals in the control group. At baseline, no statistical significant differences between the two groups were found for the primary outcome variables.
This is the first trial evaluating both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a health promotion intervention targeting physical activity and healthy eating in mental health care using a cluster preference randomized controlled design. The baseline characteristics already demonstrate the unhealthy condition of the study population.
This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov - NCT 01336946.
越来越多的人关注针对精神障碍患者的身体活动和健康饮食的健康促进计划的效果。评估公共卫生干预措施的效果研究设计提出了一些问题,目前的文献似乎仅提供了此类计划有效性的有限证据。本研究旨在检验针对居住在庇护性住房中的精神障碍患者的身体活动和健康饮食的健康促进干预的效果和成本效益。本文描述了研究设计和基线结果。
方法/设计:该设计包括集群偏好随机对照试验。要求佛兰德斯地区(比利时)的所有庇护性住房组织是否有兴趣参与研究,以及是否有作为干预组或对照组的偏好。没有偏好的组织被随机分配到干预组或对照组。干预组的个体在常规治疗之外接受为期 10 周的健康促进干预。在基线、第 10 周和第 36 周进行结果评估。主要结局指标包括体重、体重指数、腰围和体脂肪量。次要结局指标包括身体活动水平、饮食习惯、健康相关生活质量和精神症状严重程度。通过计算成本效益比和经济建模来检验干预的成本效益。25 个庇护性住房组织同意参与。在个体层面,有 324 名患者愿意参与,其中干预组 225 人,对照组 99 人。在基线时,两组主要结局变量之间没有统计学上的显著差异。
这是第一个使用集群偏好随机对照设计评估针对精神卫生保健中身体活动和健康饮食的健康促进干预的效果和成本效益的试验。基线特征已经表明了研究人群的不健康状况。
本研究在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册 - NCT 01336946。