Suppr超能文献

青少年社区肥胖预防干预后心理健康和幸福结局的系统评价

Systematic review of mental health and well-being outcomes following community-based obesity prevention interventions among adolescents.

作者信息

Hoare Erin, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz Matthew, Skouteris Helen, Millar Lynne, Nichols Melanie, Allender Steven

机构信息

School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 5;5(1):e006586. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006586.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This paper aimed to systematically evaluate the mental health and well-being outcomes observed in previous community-based obesity prevention interventions in adolescent populations.

SETTING

Systematic review of literature from database inception to October 2014. Articles were sourced from CINAHL, Global Health, Health Source: Nursing and Academic Edition, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES and PsycINFO, all of which were accessed through EBSCOhost. The Cochrane Database was also searched to identify all eligible articles. PRISMA guidelines were followed and search terms and search strategy ensured all possible studies were identified for review.

PARTICIPANTS

Intervention studies were eligible for inclusion if they were: focused on overweight or obesity prevention, community-based, targeted adolescents (aged 10-19 years), reported a mental health or well-being measure, and included a comparison or control group. Studies that focused on specific adolescent groups or were treatment interventions were excluded from review. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were measures of mental health and well-being, including diagnostic and symptomatic measures. Secondary outcomes included adiposity or weight-related measures.

RESULTS

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria; one reported anxiety/depressive outcomes, two reported on self-perception well-being measures such as self-esteem and self-efficacy, and four studies reported outcomes of quality of life. Positive mental health outcomes demonstrated that following obesity prevention, interventions included a decrease in anxiety and improved health-related quality of life. Quality of evidence was graded as very low.

CONCLUSIONS

Although positive outcomes for mental health and well-being do exist, controlled evaluations of community-based obesity prevention interventions have not often included mental health measures (n=7). It is recommended that future interventions incorporate mental health and well-being measures to identify any potential mechanisms influencing adolescent weight-related outcomes, and equally to ensure interventions are not causing harm to adolescent mental health.

摘要

目的

本文旨在系统评价以往针对青少年人群的社区肥胖预防干预措施中观察到的心理健康和幸福感结果。

设置

对从数据库建立至2014年10月的文献进行系统综述。文章来源于护理学与健康、护理学与学术版、MEDLINE、心理学文摘和心理学文摘数据库,所有这些均通过EBSCOhost获取。还检索了Cochrane数据库以识别所有符合条件的文章。遵循PRISMA指南,搜索词和搜索策略确保识别出所有可能的研究以供综述。

参与者

如果干预研究符合以下条件,则有资格纳入:关注超重或肥胖预防、基于社区、针对青少年(10 - 19岁)、报告了心理健康或幸福感测量指标,并且包括一个比较组或对照组。关注特定青少年群体或为治疗干预的研究被排除在综述之外。使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)指南评估证据质量。

主要和次要结局指标

主要结局是心理健康和幸福感测量指标,包括诊断和症状性测量指标。次要结局包括肥胖或与体重相关的测量指标。

结果

七项研究符合纳入标准;一项报告了焦虑/抑郁结果,两项报告了自我认知幸福感测量指标,如自尊和自我效能,四项研究报告了生活质量结果。积极的心理健康结果表明,肥胖预防干预措施包括焦虑减少和与健康相关的生活质量改善。证据质量被评为极低。

结论

虽然确实存在心理健康和幸福感的积极结果,但对基于社区的肥胖预防干预措施的对照评估通常未包括心理健康测量指标(n = 7)。建议未来的干预措施纳入心理健康和幸福感测量指标,以识别影响青少年体重相关结果的任何潜在机制,同时确保干预措施不会对青少年心理健康造成伤害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5978/4289720/fcfd312b99d4/bmjopen2014006586f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验