Suppr超能文献

加速度计佩戴时间对体力活动数据的影响:NHANES 半仿真数据方法。

Impact of accelerometer wear time on physical activity data: a NHANES semisimulation data approach.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(3):278-82. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091410. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current research practice employs wide-ranging accelerometer wear time criteria to identify a valid day of physical activity (PA) measurement.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of varying amounts of daily accelerometer wear time on PA data.

METHODS

A total of 1000 days of accelerometer data from 1000 participants (age=38.7 ± 14.3 years; body mass index=28.2 ± 6.7 kg/m(2)) were selected from the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Study data set. A reference data set was created using 200 random days with 14 h/day of wear time. Four additional samples of 200 days were randomly selected with a wear time of 10, 11, 12 and 13 h/day(1). These data sets were used in day-to-day comparison to create four semisimulation data sets (10, 11, 12, 13 h/day) from the reference data set. Differences in step count and time spent in inactivity (<100 cts/min), light (100-1951 cts/min), moderate (1952-5724 cts/min) and vigorous (≥5725 cts/min) intensity PA were assessed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and absolute percent error (APE).

RESULTS

There were significant differences for moderate intensity PA between the reference data set and semisimulation data sets of 10 and 11 h/day. Differences were observed in 10-13 h/day(1) for inactivity and light intensity PA, and 10-12 h/day for steps (all p values <0.05). APE increased with shorter wear time (13 h/day=3.9-14.1%; 12 h/day=9.9-15.2%, 11 h/day=17.1-35.5%; 10 h/day=24.6-40.3%).

DISCUSSION

These data suggest that using accelerometer wear time criteria of 12 h/day or less may underestimate step count and time spent in various PA levels.

摘要

背景

当前的研究实践采用了广泛的加速度计佩戴时间标准来确定有效的体力活动(PA)测量日。

目的

评估不同的每日加速度计佩戴时间对 PA 数据的影响。

方法

从 2005-2006 年全国健康和营养检查调查数据集中选择了 1000 名参与者(年龄=38.7±14.3 岁;体重指数=28.2±6.7kg/m(2))的 1000 天加速度计数据。使用 200 天佩戴时间为 14 小时/天的随机数据创建参考数据集。另外随机选择了四个佩戴时间分别为 10、11、12 和 13 小时/天的 200 天的样本(1)。这些数据集用于与参考数据集进行日常比较,从参考数据集创建四个半模拟数据集(10、11、12、13 小时/天)。使用重复测量方差分析和绝对百分比误差(APE)评估步数和静止(<100 cts/min)、轻(100-1951 cts/min)、中(1952-5724 cts/min)和剧烈(≥5725 cts/min)强度 PA 时间的差异。

结果

参考数据集与 10 和 11 小时/天的半模拟数据集之间在中度强度 PA 方面存在显著差异。在 10-13 小时/天(1)中观察到静止和低强度 PA 以及 10-12 小时/天的步数存在差异(所有 p 值<0.05)。APE 随佩戴时间缩短而增加(13 小时/天=3.9-14.1%;12 小时/天=9.9-15.2%,11 小时/天=17.1-35.5%;10 小时/天=24.6-40.3%)。

讨论

这些数据表明,使用 12 小时/天或更短的加速度计佩戴时间标准可能会低估步数和各种 PA 水平的时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验