Memory Center of Nice (Centre Mémoire de Ressources et de Recherche), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, France.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;28(4):383-92. doi: 10.1002/gps.3836. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a nursing home (NH) staff education to manage apathy in older individuals with a diagnosis of dementia.
Sixteen NHs agreed to participate, and 230 demented apathetic residents were randomly assigned to the reference group (RG) or the intervention group (IG). IG received a month of weekly 4-h training. Qualitative evaluation was performed through interviews and questionnaires regarding work practices and knowledge about dementia. Quantitative evaluation was at baseline, at the end of the training program (week 4), and 3 months after the end of it with the use of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), the Apathy Inventory, and two observation scales.
In the qualitative evaluation, very few staff responded to the questionnaire. Concerning the difficulty that managing residents' behavioral symptoms presented, aggressiveness was ranked as the most difficult behavior to manage and apathy as the least difficult. In the quantitative evaluation, the results are as follows. NPI: the IG scores increased from baseline to week 4 more than the RG for symptoms belonging to the affective and the psychotic NPI item subgroup. Apathy Inventory: there was a significant decrease of the emotional blunting score dimension in the IG. Group Observation Scale: significant improvement was observed for the emotional blunting dimension in the IG only.
Apathy is rarely identified as a problem in NH. Emotional blunting was the only dimension sensitive to change. Failure to improve residents' level of interest could be explained by the difficulties encountered in accessing information regarding the subjects' personal interests. But it remains possible to modify residents' emotional reactivity and staff's perceptions of residents' behaviors and emotions.
本研究旨在评估对养老院(NH)工作人员进行管理痴呆症患者淡漠症的培训的效果。
16 家 NH 同意参与,230 名患有淡漠症的痴呆症患者被随机分配到对照组(RG)或干预组(IG)。IG 接受为期一个月的每周 4 小时培训。通过关于工作实践和痴呆症知识的访谈和问卷调查进行定性评估。在基线、培训计划结束时(第 4 周)和培训结束后 3 个月进行定量评估,使用神经精神问卷(NPI)、淡漠量表和两个观察量表。
在定性评估中,很少有员工回答问卷。关于管理居民行为症状的难度,攻击性被列为最难管理的行为,而淡漠症则是最容易管理的行为。在定量评估中,结果如下。NPI:IG 的评分从基线到第 4 周增加的幅度大于 RG,属于情感和精神病 NPI 项目亚组的症状。淡漠量表:IG 的情感迟钝评分维度显著下降。团体观察量表:IG 的情感迟钝维度有明显改善。
淡漠症在 NH 中很少被识别为问题。情感迟钝是唯一对变化敏感的维度。未能提高居民的兴趣水平可能是由于难以获取有关居民个人兴趣的信息。但仍然有可能改变居民的情绪反应和工作人员对居民行为和情绪的看法。