Health Protection Agency, UK.
Eur Respir J. 2013 Mar;41(3):627-34. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00034912. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
We assessed whether implementation of a combination of interventions in London tuberculosis clinics raised the levels of HIV test offers, acceptance and coverage. A stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted across 24 clinics. Interventions were training of clinical staff and provision of tailor-made information resources with or without a change in clinic policy from selective to universal HIV testing. The primary outcome was HIV test acceptance amongst those offered a test, before and after the intervention; the secondary outcome was an offer of HIV testing. Additionally, the number and proportion of HIV tests among all clinic attendees (coverage) was assessed. 1,315 patients were seen in 24 clinics. The offer and coverage of testing rose significantly in clinics without (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004, respectively) and with an existing policy of universal testing (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). However, the level of HIV test acceptance did not increase in 18 clinics without routine universal testing (p = 0.76) or the six clinics with existing universal testing (p = 0.40). The intervention significantly increased the number of HIV tests offered and proportion of participants tested, although acceptance did not change significantly. However, the magnitude of increase is modest due to the high baseline coverage.
我们评估了在伦敦结核诊所实施一系列干预措施是否提高了 HIV 检测提供、接受和覆盖的水平。在 24 家诊所进行了一项阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验。干预措施包括对临床工作人员进行培训,并提供定制的信息资源,同时改变或不改变诊所的政策,从选择性 HIV 检测改为普遍 HIV 检测。主要结果是在干预前后提供检测的人中 HIV 检测的接受率;次要结果是提供 HIV 检测。此外,还评估了所有就诊者(覆盖范围)中的 HIV 检测数量和比例。在 24 家诊所共接待了 1315 名患者。在没有(分别为 p = 0.002 和 p = 0.004)和已经实行普遍检测政策的诊所(分别为 p = 0.02 和 p = 0.04),检测的提供和覆盖显著增加。然而,在没有常规普遍检测的 18 家诊所(p = 0.76)或已经实行普遍检测的 6 家诊所(p = 0.40),HIV 检测的接受率并没有增加。干预措施显著增加了提供的 HIV 检测数量和接受检测的参与者比例,尽管接受率没有显著变化。然而,由于基线覆盖率较高,增加的幅度较小。