Suppr超能文献

用认知筛查测试预测危重病幸存者的认知后遗症。

Predicting cognitive sequelae in survivors of critical illness with cognitive screening tests.

机构信息

Neuropsychology Section, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, 2101 Commonwealth Boulevard, Suite C, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug 15;186(4):333-40. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201112-2261OC. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Survivors of critical illness have a high rate of cognitive impairments that may persist years after hospital discharge. Data are lacking regarding whether cognitive screening tests administered at hospital discharge can be used to predict which critically ill patients are likely to have long-term cognitive sequelae.

OBJECTIVES

This prospective study assessed whether two cognitive screening tests, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Mini-Cog, administered at hospital discharge, predict cognitive sequelae in survivors of critical illness 6 months after hospital discharge.

METHODS

Seventy critically ill patients completed the MMSE and Mini-Cog just before hospital discharge. Of these 70 patients, 53 completed a neuropsychological battery 6 months after hospital discharge.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

At hospital discharge, 45 patients (64%) had impaired performance on the MMSE (score < 27, mean = 24.4) and 32 (45%) on the Mini-Cog. Twenty-seven patients (39%) were impaired on both the MMSE and Mini-Cog, whereas only 20 patients (28%) had scores in the normal range on both tests. Cognitive sequelae occurred in 57% of survivors (30 of 53) at 6 months, with predominant dysfunction in the memory (38%) and executive (36%) domains. Logistic regression analyses showed that neither the MMSE nor the Mini-Cog predicted cognitive sequelae at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

A large number of critically ill survivors had cognitive impairments, as assessed by the MMSE and Mini-Cog, at hospital discharge. However, the MMSE and Mini-Cog scores did not predict long-term cognitive sequelae at 6-month follow-up and cannot be used as surrogate endpoints for long-term cognitive impairment.

摘要

背景

危重病幸存者的认知障碍发生率很高,这种情况可能会在出院后持续多年。目前缺乏数据表明,在出院时进行的认知筛查测试是否可以用于预测哪些重症患者可能会出现长期认知后遗症。

目的

本前瞻性研究评估了在出院时进行的两项认知筛查测试,即简易精神状态检查(MMSE)和迷你认知测试(Mini-Cog),是否可以预测重症患者出院后 6 个月的认知后遗症。

方法

70 名危重病患者在出院前完成了 MMSE 和 Mini-Cog。在这 70 名患者中,有 53 名在出院后 6 个月完成了神经心理学测试。

测量和主要结果

在出院时,45 名患者(64%)的 MMSE 评分(<27 分,平均值=24.4 分)受损,32 名患者(45%)的 Mini-Cog 评分受损。27 名患者(39%)在 MMSE 和 Mini-Cog 两项测试中均受损,而只有 20 名患者(28%)在两项测试中均得分正常。在 6 个月时,有 57%的幸存者(30 名中的 57%)出现认知后遗症,主要表现为记忆力(38%)和执行力(36%)障碍。逻辑回归分析显示,MMSE 和 Mini-Cog 评分均不能预测 6 个月时的认知后遗症。

结论

大量危重病幸存者在出院时,通过 MMSE 和 Mini-Cog 评估,存在认知障碍。然而,MMSE 和 Mini-Cog 评分不能预测 6 个月时的长期认知后遗症,不能作为长期认知障碍的替代终点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验