Bernstein I H, Bissonnette V, Welch K R
Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Arlington 76019-0528.
Percept Psychophys. 1990 Dec;48(6):525-34. doi: 10.3758/bf03211598.
In two experiments, subjects made pairs of lexical decisions verbally. In Experiment 1, masked stimuli appeared concurrently to the left and right of fixation; in Experiment 2, nonmasked stimuli appeared sequentially at fixation. The left-hand letter strings were judged more accurately in in Experiment 1, and the second letter strings were judged more accurately in Experiment 2. Each string in the pair could be either a word (e.g., fork) or a nonword anagram (e.g., frok). Consequently, the two strings in the pair could be related (e.g., fork-spoon, frok-spoon, etc.) or unrelated (e.g., fork-door, frok-door, etc.), independently of whether neither, either, or both strings were words. Semantically related stimuli induced consistent biases to respond "word," as noted in other studies. These biases were typically stronger for the event reported second. Minimal evidence was found for perceptual priming effects. The asymmetrical effects were consistent with spreading-activation-type mechanisms, but other considerations support a multiple-process view.
在两项实验中,受试者通过口头方式进行词汇判断配对。在实验1中,掩蔽刺激同时出现在注视点的左侧和右侧;在实验2中,非掩蔽刺激依次出现在注视点处。在实验1中,左手边的字母串判断得更准确,而在实验2中,第二个字母串判断得更准确。配对中的每个字符串可以是一个单词(例如,fork)或一个非单词变位词(例如,frok)。因此,配对中的两个字符串可以是相关的(例如,fork - spoon、frok - spoon等)或不相关的(例如,fork - door、frok - door等),这与两个字符串都不是单词、只有一个是单词或两个都是单词无关。如其他研究中所指出的,语义相关的刺激会引发一致的偏向,倾向于回答“是单词”。这些偏向通常对于第二个报告的事件更强。几乎没有发现感知启动效应的证据。这种不对称效应与扩散激活型机制一致,但其他因素支持多过程观点。