Luo C R, Johnson R A, Gallo D A
Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459-0408, USA.
Mem Cognit. 1998 Jul;26(4):833-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03211402.
A semantic relatedness decision task was used to investigate whether phonological recording occurs automatically and whether it mediates lexical access in visual word recognition and reading. In this task, subjects read a pair of words and decided whether they were related or unrelated in meaning. In Experiment 1, unrelated word-homophone pairs (e.g., LION-BARE) and their visual controls (e.g., LION-BEAN) as well as related word pairs (e.g., FISH-NET) were presented. Homophone pairs were more likely to be judged as related or more slowly rejected as unrelated than their control pairs, suggesting phonological access of word meanings. In Experiment 2, word-pseudohomophone pairs (e.g., TABLE-CHARE) and their visual controls (e.g., TABLE-CHARK) as well as related and unrelated word pairs were presented. Pseudohomophone pairs were more likely to be judged as related or more slowly rejected as unrelated than their control pairs, again suggesting automatic phonological recording in reading.
一项语义相关性判断任务被用于研究语音记录是否自动发生，以及它是否在视觉单词识别和阅读中调节词汇通达。在这个任务中，受试者阅读一对单词，并判断它们在意义上是相关还是不相关。在实验1中，呈现了不相关的同音异形词对（例如，LION-BARE）及其视觉对照（例如，LION-BEAN）以及相关词对（例如，FISH-NET）。与对照词对相比，同音异形词对更有可能被判断为相关，或者作为不相关被拒绝的速度更慢，这表明单词意义的语音通达。在实验2中，呈现了单词-假同音异形词对（例如，TABLE-CHARE）及其视觉对照（例如，TABLE-CHARK）以及相关和不相关词对。与对照词对相比，假同音异形词对更有可能被判断为相关，或者作为不相关被拒绝的速度更慢，再次表明阅读中存在自动语音记录。
