Smith M C, Theodor L, Franklin P E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1983 Oct;9(4):697-712. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.9.4.697.
Two experiments examined how depth of processing on a contextual priming item affects (a) the amount of priming obtained in the processing of a target item in a lexical decision task (LDT) and (b) subsequent episodic memory for the prime and target items. Experiment 1, in which prime and target items were presented sequentially, yielded three main results: (a) The magnitude of the priming effect, measured by the difference between lexical decision times to word targets preceded by related and unrelated primes, increased as the depth of prime processing increased. (b) In an unexpected postsession recognition test, episodic memory for a prime was dependent on the depth to which it had been processed, whereas memory for a target was unaffected by the depth of processing that had occurred on its prime. (c) Episodic memory for both primes and targets was greater when they had appeared in related pairs rather than unrelated pairs in the LDT. However, unlike immediate contextual priming, the magnitude of the semantic relatedness effect in episodic recognition was not affected by level of processing. In Experiment 2 a two-word LDT was used in which a yes response was made only if two simultaneously presented letter strings were both words. Depth of processing was varied by using different types of nonword distractors: pronounceable nonwords, random letter strings, or strings of Xs. As in Experiment 1, priming was greater and episodic recognition was better, the deeper the level of processing that occurred in the LDT. Similarly, episodic recognition memory was greater for items that had appeared in related pairs in the LDT. Although these data suggest that similar processes modulate both contextual priming effects and episodic recognition, the dissociation in some conditions between the occurrence of contextual priming in the LDT and later relatedness effects in episodic recognition indicate that the underlying mechanisms are not identical.
(a)在词汇判断任务(LDT)中目标项加工时获得的启动量,以及(b)随后对启动项和目标项的情景记忆。实验1中,启动项和目标项依次呈现,得出了三个主要结果:(a)启动效应的大小,通过相关启动项和不相关启动项之后的单词目标的词汇判断时间差异来衡量,随着启动项加工深度的增加而增加。(b)在意外的会话后识别测试中,对启动项的情景记忆取决于其被加工的深度,而对目标项的记忆不受其启动项加工深度的影响。(c)当启动项和目标项在LDT中出现在相关对而非不相关对中时,它们的情景记忆更强。然而,与即时情境启动不同,情景识别中语义相关性效应的大小不受加工水平的影响。在实验2中,使用了双词LDT,其中只有当两个同时呈现的字母串都是单词时才做出肯定回答。通过使用不同类型的非单词干扰项来改变加工深度:可发音的非单词、随机字母串或X串。与实验1一样,LDT中发生的加工水平越深,启动效应越大,情景识别越好。同样,对于在LDT中出现在相关对中的项目,情景识别记忆更强。尽管这些数据表明相似的过程调节情境启动效应和情景识别,但在某些条件下,LDT中的情境启动与随后情景识别中的相关性效应之间的分离表明其潜在机制并不相同。