Department of Nephro-Urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):582-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
Laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux has gained acceptance as a feasible treatment associated with minimal morbidity. However, ureteral advancement with this technique has not been attempted. We examined the usefulness of ureteral advancement via laparoscopy.
A total of 30 patients with 51 refluxing ureters underwent laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for treatment of vesicoureteral reflux between August 2009 and September 2011. Mean ± SD patient age was 60.8 ± 48.6 months. During the procedure 15 patients underwent ureteral advancement (advancement group), while 15 did not (nonadvancement group). We compared operative times and postoperative rates of urinary tract infections and persistent reflux between the groups.
There was no significant difference in operative times in unilateral (mean ± SD 110 ± 25 vs 125 ± 42 minutes) and bilateral cases (mean ± SD 214 ± 52 vs 203 ± 40 minutes) between the nonadvancement vs advancement groups. All patients underwent voiding cystourethrography 3 to 4 months postoperatively. Reflux resolution rate for ureters was significantly higher in the advancement group (100%) than in the nonadvancement group (85%, p <0.05). No patient in the advancement group had postoperative urinary tract infection. Fixation of the ureter with the bladder muscularis at the proximal limit of the detrusor defect and/or a percutaneous hitch stitch placed in the ventral side of the proximal limit of the detrusor defect facilitated ureteral advancement.
Ureteral advancement is a simple and feasible procedure in laparoscopic ureteral extravesical reimplantation and may improve the resolution rate of vesicoureteral reflux.
腹腔镜下膀胱外输尿管再植术治疗膀胱输尿管反流已被认为是一种可行的治疗方法,其并发症较少。然而,该技术尚未尝试进行输尿管推进。我们研究了腹腔镜下输尿管推进的有效性。
2009 年 8 月至 2011 年 9 月,我们对 30 例 51 侧反流输尿管患者采用腹腔镜下膀胱外输尿管再植术治疗膀胱输尿管反流。患者平均年龄(60.8±48.6)岁。术中 15 例进行了输尿管推进(推进组),15 例未进行(非推进组)。我们比较了两组患者的手术时间以及术后尿路感染和持续性反流的发生率。
单侧(平均±标准差 110±25 比 125±42 分钟)和双侧病例(平均±标准差 214±52 比 203±40 分钟)中,非推进组与推进组之间的手术时间均无显著差异。所有患者术后 3-4 个月均行排尿性膀胱尿道造影。推进组输尿管反流缓解率(100%)显著高于非推进组(85%,p<0.05)。推进组无术后尿路感染患者。在近端逼尿肌缺损的膀胱肌层处固定输尿管和/或在近端逼尿肌缺损的腹侧放置经皮固定缝线有助于输尿管推进。
在腹腔镜下输尿管膀胱外再植术中,输尿管推进是一种简单可行的方法,可能提高膀胱输尿管反流的缓解率。