• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞士初级保健中血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的特征。

Characteristics of poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes patients in Swiss primary care.

机构信息

Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012 Jun 15;11:70. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-70.

DOI:10.1186/1475-2840-11-70
PMID:22704274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3403845/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although a variety of treatment guidelines for Type 2 diabetes patients are available, a majority of patients does not achieve recommended targets. We aimed to characterise Type 2 diabetes patients from Swiss primary care who miss HbA1c treatment goals and to reveal factors associated with the poorly controlled HbA1c level.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study nested within the cluster randomised controlled Chronic Care for Diabetes study. Type 2 diabetes patients with at least one HbA1c measurement ≥ 7.0 % during the last year were recruited from Swiss primary care. Data assessment included diabetes specific and general clinical measures, treatment factors and patient reported outcomes.

RESULTS

326 Type 2 diabetes patients from 30 primary care practices with a mean age 67.1 ± 10.6 years participated in the study. The patients' findings for HbA1c were 7.7 ± 1.3 %, for systolic blood pressure 139.1 ± 17.6 mmHg, for diastolic blood pressure 80.9 ± 10.5 mmHg and for low density lipoprotein 2.7 ± 1.1. 93.3 % of the patients suffered from at least one comorbidity and were treated with 4.8 ± 2.1 different drugs. No determining factor was significantly related to HbA1c in the multiple analysis, but a significant clustering effect of GPs on HbA1c could be found.

CONCLUSIONS

Within our sample of patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes, no "bullet points" could be pointed out which can be addressed easily by some kind of intervention. Especially within this subgroup of diabetes patients who would benefit the most from appropriate interventions to improve diabetes control, a complex interaction between diabetes control, comorbidities, GPs' treatment and patients' health behaviour seems to exist. So far this interaction is only poorly described and understood.

摘要

背景

尽管有多种治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的指南,但大多数患者并未达到推荐的目标。我们旨在描述瑞士初级保健中错过糖化血红蛋白治疗目标的 2 型糖尿病患者,并揭示与控制不佳的糖化血红蛋白水平相关的因素。

方法

在慢性糖尿病护理的集群随机对照研究中进行的横断面研究。从瑞士初级保健中招募了至少有一次糖化血红蛋白测量值≥7.0%的 2 型糖尿病患者。数据评估包括糖尿病特异性和一般临床指标、治疗因素和患者报告的结果。

结果

30 家初级保健机构的 326 名 2 型糖尿病患者参加了这项研究,平均年龄为 67.1±10.6 岁。患者的糖化血红蛋白值为 7.7±1.3%,收缩压为 139.1±17.6mmHg,舒张压为 80.9±10.5mmHg,低密度脂蛋白为 2.7±1.1。93.3%的患者患有至少一种合并症,并接受了 4.8±2.1 种不同的药物治疗。在多因素分析中,没有确定的因素与糖化血红蛋白显著相关,但可以发现全科医生对糖化血红蛋白的聚类效应。

结论

在我们控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者样本中,没有发现任何“要点”可以通过某种干预措施轻松解决。特别是在这群最需要适当干预措施来改善糖尿病控制的糖尿病患者中,糖尿病控制、合并症、全科医生的治疗和患者的健康行为之间似乎存在着复杂的相互作用。到目前为止,这种相互作用还描述和理解得很少。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes patients in Swiss primary care.瑞士初级保健中血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的特征。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012 Jun 15;11:70. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-70.
2
Optimal type 2 diabetes mellitus management: the randomised controlled OPTIMISE benchmarking study: baseline results from six European countries.优化 2 型糖尿病管理:随机对照 OPTIMISE 基准研究:来自六个欧洲国家的基线结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):1095-105. doi: 10.1177/2047487312449414. Epub 2012 May 17.
3
Management and treatment goals in Polish patients with type 2 diabetes of short duration: results of the ARETAEUS2-Grupa study.波兰短期2型糖尿病患者的管理与治疗目标:ARETAEUS2 - Grupa研究结果
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2013;123(11):573-81. doi: 10.20452/pamw.1964. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
4
Adherence to national diabetes guidelines through monitoring quality indicators--A comparison of three types of care for the elderly with special emphasis on HbA1c.通过监测质量指标来坚持国家糖尿病指南——三种老年护理类型的比较,特别强调糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)
Prim Care Diabetes. 2015 Aug;9(4):253-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
5
Cardiovascular risk management in type 2 diabetes of more than 10-year duration: Results of Polish ARETAEUS2-Grupa Study.病程超过10年的2型糖尿病患者的心血管风险管理:波兰阿雷泰乌斯2组研究结果
Cardiol J. 2015;22(2):150-9. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0067. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
6
Assessing variability in compliance with recommendations given by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care using electronic records. The APNA study.利用电子记录评估初级保健中2型糖尿病患者遵循国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)建议情况的变异性。APNA研究。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2018 Feb;12(1):34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
7
Guidelines and clinical practice at the primary level of healthcare in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without kidney disease in five European countries.五个欧洲国家中患有和未患有肾脏疾病的2型糖尿病患者在基层医疗保健层面的指南与临床实践
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2019 Jan;16(1):47-56. doi: 10.1177/1479164118795559. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
8
Mismatch between ADA and AGS recommendations for glycated hemoglobin targets for older adults.美国糖尿病协会(ADA)与美国老年病学会(AGS)针对老年人糖化血红蛋白目标的建议存在差异。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2018 Apr;12(2):192-194. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Clinical coaching in primary care: Capable of improving control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?基层医疗中的临床指导:能否改善2型糖尿病患者的病情控制?
Prim Care Diabetes. 2016 Jun;10(3):171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
10
Prevalence of comorbidity in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes and its association with elevated HbA1c: A cross-sectional study in Croatia.克罗地亚2型糖尿病初级保健患者的合并症患病率及其与糖化血红蛋白升高的关联:一项横断面研究
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016;34(1):66-72. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1132886. Epub 2016 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Effects of Financial Incentives for General Practitioners on Quality Indicators in the Treatment of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care-A Follow-Up Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Parallel Controlled Trial.全科医生经济激励对基层医疗中糖尿病患者治疗质量指标的长期影响——一项整群随机平行对照试验的随访分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 26;8:664510. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.664510. eCollection 2021.
2
Shared decision making and patient-centeredness for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care-results of the cluster-randomised controlled DEBATE trial.在初级保健中,针对血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者的共同决策和以患者为中心-DEBATE 试验的集群随机对照结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 May 15;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01436-6.
3
Interest in and use of person-centred pharmacy services - a Swiss study of people with diabetes.对以患者为中心的药学服务的兴趣和使用——一项针对糖尿病患者的瑞士研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06217-6.
4
Quality performance and associated factors in Swiss diabetes care - A cross-sectional study.瑞士糖尿病护理的质量绩效及其相关因素——一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232686. eCollection 2020.
5
Clinic and patient variation in intermediate clinical outcomes for type 2 diabetes: a multilevel analysis.2 型糖尿病中间临床结局的临床和患者差异:一项多层次分析。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 15;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1045-1.
6
Associations between multimorbidity, all-cause mortality and glycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.2 型糖尿病患者的共病、全因死亡率与血糖之间的关联:系统综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0209585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209585. eCollection 2018.
7
Perceptions of insulin use in type 2 diabetes in primary care: a thematic synthesis.基层医疗中2型糖尿病患者对胰岛素使用的认知:一项主题综合分析
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 22;19(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0753-2.
8
Effectiveness of chronic care models for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲慢性照护模式对2型糖尿病管理的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e013076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013076.
9
The concordance of care for age related macular degeneration with the chronic care model: a multi-centered cross-sectional study.年龄相关性黄斑变性的护理与慢性病护理模式的一致性:一项多中心横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):e108536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108536. eCollection 2014.
10
Both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidity are related to health status in well-controlled type 2 diabetes patients: a cross-sectional analysis.在血糖控制良好的 2 型糖尿病患者中,心血管和非心血管合并症均与健康状况相关:一项横断面分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012 Oct 5;11:121. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-121.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence, awareness and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Switzerland: the CoLaus study.瑞士 2 型糖尿病的患病率、知晓率和治疗情况:CoLaus 研究。
Diabet Med. 2012 Feb;29(2):190-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03422.x.
2
Regional differences of glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Switzerland: a national cross-sectional survey.瑞士 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制的地域差异:全国横断面调查。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2011 Jul 7;141:w13218. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13218. eCollection 2011.
3
Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial.早期强化多因素治疗对筛查出的 2 型糖尿病患者 5 年心血管结局的影响(ADDITION-Europe):一项集群随机试验。
Lancet. 2011 Jul 9;378(9786):156-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60698-3. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
4
Peer support for patients with type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial.同伴支持对 2 型糖尿病患者的作用:群组随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2011 Feb 15;342:d715. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d715.
5
Association of depression with treatment outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a cross-sectional study from Karachi, Pakistan.抑郁症与 2 型糖尿病治疗效果的关系:来自巴基斯坦卡拉奇的一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Feb 15;11:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-27.
6
Validation of the PHQ-9 as a screening instrument for depression in diabetes patients in specialized outpatient clinics.验证 PHQ-9 作为专门门诊糖尿病患者抑郁筛查工具的有效性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 12;10:235. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-235.
7
The Chronic CARe for diAbeTes study (CARAT): a cluster randomized controlled trial.慢性糖尿病关怀研究(CARAT):一项群组随机对照试验。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010 Jun 15;9:23. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-23.
8
Multifactorial control and treatment intensity of type-2 diabetes in primary care settings in Catalonia.加泰罗尼亚初级保健环境中 2 型糖尿病的多因素控制和治疗强度。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010 Mar 29;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-14.
9
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2010》
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011.
10
Comorbidity affects the relationship between glycemic control and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetes: a cohort study.合并症影响糖尿病患者血糖控制与心血管结局的关系:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 15;151(12):854-60. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00005.