• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性糖尿病关怀研究(CARAT):一项群组随机对照试验。

The Chronic CARe for diAbeTes study (CARAT): a cluster randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010 Jun 15;9:23. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-23.

DOI:10.1186/1475-2840-9-23
PMID:20550650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2902433/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is a major challenge for the health care system and especially for the primary care provider. The Chronic Care Model represents an evidence-based framework for the care for chronically ill. An increasing number of studies showed that implementing elements of the Chronic Care Model improves patient relevant outcomes and process parameters. However, most of these findings have been performed in settings different from the Swiss health care system which is dominated by single handed practices.

METHODS/DESIGN: CARAT is a cluster randomized controlled trial with general practitioners as the unit of randomization (trial registration: ISRCTN05947538). The study challenges the hypothesis that implementing several elements of the Chronic Care Model via a specially trained practice nurse improves the HbA1c level of diabetes type II patients significantly after one year (primary outcome). Furthermore, we assume that the intervention increases the proportion of patients who achieve the recommended targets regarding blood pressure (<130/80), HbA1c (=<6.5%) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (<2.6 mmol/l), increases patients' quality of life (SF-36) and several evidence-based quality indicators for diabetes care. These improvements in care will be experienced by the patients (PACIC-5A) as well as by the practice team (ACIC). According to the power calculation, 28 general practitioners will be randomized either to the intervention group or to the control group. Each general practitioner will include 12 patients suffering from diabetes type II. In the intervention group the general practitioner as well as the practice nurse will be trained to perform care for diabetes patients according to the Chronic Care Model in teamwork. In the control group no intervention will be applied at all and patients will be treated as usual. Measurements (pre-data-collection) will take place in months II-IV, starting in February 2010. Follow-up data will be collected after 1 year.

DISCUSSION

This study challenges the hypothesis that the Chronic Care Model can be easily implemented by a practice nurse focused approach. If our results will confirm this hypothesis the suggestion arises whether this approach should be implemented in other chronic diseases and multimorbid patients and how to redesign care in Switzerland.

摘要

背景

糖尿病是医疗保健系统面临的主要挑战,尤其是对初级保健提供者而言。慢性病照护模式是一种针对慢性病患者的循证护理框架。越来越多的研究表明,实施慢性病照护模式的各项元素可以改善患者相关的结局和流程参数。然而,这些发现大多是在与瑞士医疗保健系统不同的环境中进行的,瑞士的医疗保健系统主要由单人执业医师主导。

方法/设计:CARAT 是一项针对全科医生的群组随机对照试验(试验注册:ISRCTN05947538)。该研究对以下假设提出了挑战,即通过专门培训的执业护士实施慢性病照护模式的几个元素,可以在一年后显著改善 II 型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平(主要结局)。此外,我们假设该干预措施可以提高达到血压(<130/80)、HbA1c(<6.5%)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(<2.6 mmol/l)推荐目标的患者比例,提高患者的生活质量(SF-36)和几项循证糖尿病护理质量指标。患者(PACIC-5A)和执业团队(ACIC)都将体验到这些护理的改善。根据计算的功效,将有 28 名全科医生被随机分配到干预组或对照组。每位全科医生将纳入 12 名 II 型糖尿病患者。在干预组中,全科医生和执业护士将接受培训,以团队合作的方式根据慢性病照护模式为糖尿病患者提供护理。在对照组中,将不进行任何干预,患者将按常规治疗。测量(预数据收集)将在 2010 年 2 月开始的第 II-IV 个月进行。随访数据将在 1 年后收集。

讨论

本研究对以下假设提出了挑战,即慢性病照护模式可以通过以执业护士为重点的方法轻松实施。如果我们的结果证实了这一假设,那么就会出现这样的建议,即在其他慢性病和多种疾病患者中是否应实施这种方法,以及如何重新设计瑞士的护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384a/2902433/cabf635da498/1475-2840-9-23-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384a/2902433/cabf635da498/1475-2840-9-23-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384a/2902433/cabf635da498/1475-2840-9-23-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Chronic CARe for diAbeTes study (CARAT): a cluster randomized controlled trial.慢性糖尿病关怀研究(CARAT):一项群组随机对照试验。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010 Jun 15;9:23. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-23.
2
Four-year long-term follow-up of diabetes patients after implementation of the Chronic Care Model in primary care: a cross-sectional study.初级保健中实施慢性病护理模式后糖尿病患者的四年长期随访:一项横断面研究。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Oct 27;147:w14522. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14522. eCollection 2017.
3
Implementation of the chronic care model in small medical practices improves cardiovascular risk but not glycemic control.在小型医疗实践中实施慢性病护理模式可以改善心血管风险,但不能改善血糖控制。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Apr;37(4):1039-47. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1429. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
4
The impact of supported telemetric monitoring in people with type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.支持性远程监测对2型糖尿病患者的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Jul 6;14:198. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-198.
5
Primary care practice-based care management for chronically ill patients (PraCMan): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN56104508].基层医疗实践为基础的慢性病患者管理(PraCMan):一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案 [ISRCTN56104508]。
Trials. 2011 Jun 29;12:163. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-163.
6
Optimal type 2 diabetes mellitus management: the randomised controlled OPTIMISE benchmarking study: baseline results from six European countries.优化 2 型糖尿病管理:随机对照 OPTIMISE 基准研究:来自六个欧洲国家的基线结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):1095-105. doi: 10.1177/2047487312449414. Epub 2012 May 17.
7
Effect of a Collaborative Care Model on Depressive Symptoms and Glycated Hemoglobin, Blood Pressure, and Serum Cholesterol Among Patients With Depression and Diabetes in India: The INDEPENDENT Randomized Clinical Trial.印度一项针对伴发抑郁和糖尿病患者的随机临床试验(INDEPENDENT)表明,协同护理模式可改善抑郁症状及糖化血红蛋白、血压和血清胆固醇水平。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 18;324(7):651-662. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11747.
8
Patient Engagement and Coaching for Health: The PEACH study--a cluster randomised controlled trial using the telephone to coach people with type 2 diabetes to engage with their GPs to improve diabetes care: a study protocol.患者健康参与与指导:PEACH研究——一项整群随机对照试验,通过电话指导2型糖尿病患者与全科医生合作以改善糖尿病护理:研究方案
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Apr 11;8:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-20.
9
Quality of type 2 diabetes management in general practice is associated with involvement of general practice nurses.在一般实践中,2 型糖尿病管理的质量与一般实践护士的参与有关。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2012 Oct;6(3):221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 May 2.
10
Effect of a Nurse-Led Diabetes Self-Management Education Program on Glycosylated Hemoglobin among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.护士主导的糖尿病自我管理教育方案对 2 型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白的影响。
J Diabetes Res. 2018 Jul 8;2018:4930157. doi: 10.1155/2018/4930157. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic-Care-Management Programs for Multimorbid Patients with Diabetes in Europe: A Scoping Review with the Aim to Identify the Best Practice.欧洲患有糖尿病的多种疾病患者的慢性病管理计划:旨在确定最佳实践的范围综述。
J Diabetes Res. 2021 Nov 9;2021:6657718. doi: 10.1155/2021/6657718. eCollection 2021.
2
Self-management behavior and fasting plasma glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over 60 years old: multiple effects of social support on quality of life.60 岁以上 2 型糖尿病患者的自我管理行为与空腹血糖控制:社会支持对生活质量的多重影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Nov 12;19(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01881-y.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2010》
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011.
2
Prevalence of known diabetes in German adults aged 25-69 years: results from national health surveys over 15 years.25-69 岁德国成年人中已知糖尿病的患病率:15 年以上国家健康调查结果。
Diabet Med. 2009 Jun;26(6):655-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02739.x.
3
["Diabetes in Germany"(DIG) study. A prospective 4-year-follow-up study on the quality of treatment for type 2 diabetes in daily practice].
Diabetic patient assessment of chronic illness care using PACIC.
使用 PACIC 评估糖尿病患者的慢性病护理。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05400-5.
4
The Manage Care Model - Developing an Evidence-Based and Expert-Driven Chronic Care Management Model for Patients with Diabetes.管理式医疗模式——为糖尿病患者开发基于证据且由专家驱动的慢性病管理模式。
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Apr 22;20(2):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4646.
5
Psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care measure (PACIC-5A) among patients with obesity.肥胖患者慢性病照护评估量表(PACIC - 5A)的心理测量学特性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 23;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3871-1.
6
Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening.提高糖尿病视网膜病变筛查参与率的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 15;1(1):CD012054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012054.pub2.
7
Effectiveness of chronic care models for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲慢性照护模式对2型糖尿病管理的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 20;7(3):e013076. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013076.
8
An overview of chronic disease models: a systematic literature review.慢性病模型概述:一项系统的文献综述。
Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Oct 29;7(2):210-27. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n2p210.
9
Secondary care clinic for chronic disease: protocol.慢性病二级护理诊所:方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Feb 16;4(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3902.
10
Continuous glucose monitors: use of waveform versus glycemic values in the improvements of glucose control, quality of life, and fear of hypoglycemia.持续葡萄糖监测仪:在改善血糖控制、生活质量和低血糖恐惧方面,波形与血糖值的应用情况
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 May;8(3):488-93. doi: 10.1177/1932296814528434. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
["德国糖尿病(DIG)研究。一项关于2型糖尿病日常治疗质量的前瞻性4年随访研究"]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Feb;134(7):291-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1123994. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
4
Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes.强化降糖对2型糖尿病的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2545-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
5
Why don't diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification.糖尿病患者为何未达到推荐的风险因素目标?是依从性差还是缺乏强化治疗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):588-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0554-8. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
6
Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. In 2007.2007年美国糖尿病的经济成本。
Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):596-615. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9017.
7
German diabetes disease management programs are appropriate for restructuring care according to the chronic care model: an evaluation with the patient assessment of chronic illness care instrument.德国糖尿病疾病管理项目适用于根据慢性病护理模式进行护理重组:使用慢性病护理患者评估工具进行的一项评估
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jun;31(6):1150-4. doi: 10.2337/dc07-2104. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
8
Case management of arthritis patients in primary care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.基层医疗中关节炎患者的病例管理:一项整群随机对照试验。
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec 15;57(8):1390-7. doi: 10.1002/art.23080.
9
Evaluation of a culturally adapted German version of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC 5A) questionnaire in a sample of osteoarthritis patients.在骨关节炎患者样本中对经文化调适的德语版慢性病患者护理评估问卷(PACIC 5A)进行评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Oct;13(5):806-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00786.x.
10
Organizing services for cardiovascular prevention.组织心血管疾病预防服务。
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2007 Aug;9(4):278-86. doi: 10.1007/s11936-007-0023-4.